The pressure to loosen clean air standards is based in allegations that the standards affect industry development and economy because the adjustments require further modernization and some industry even need to change their whole machinery or line production to be able to meet the legal requirements, as for the car industry, slowing down production or increasing costs.
In short-term that is very likely to be true, the industry will have to do some investment, but the price will be lower than the long-term cost of keeping up polluting the air.
The clean air standards should not be loosen because loosen the standards will benefits only specific groups and temporary, later and in other domains the loosen of the standards will affects human and other animals quality of life and environment. The economic impact will be seen later on healthy sector, food sector as agriculture and livestock, in nature disaster and in the lack of natural resources due to dramatic landscape changes.
We should not think about just economic impact of now when taking this decisions but we should consider systematic risks and consequences of supporting the loosen of clean air standards.
We must keep in mind that some process in nature are irreversible and when one action as the pollution of air is impacting towards things we will not be able to revert anymore the cost will be much higher in future than is now to adapt to the clean standards.
This is true. By increasing the price, the consumers will become more aware of the scarce water supplies and they will pay more attention to th way they use water. Unfortunatelly, clean water is one of the resources that will be endangered in the future so we have to take care of the resources now.
The best example of people modifying their environment is the construction of cities, where homes and offices for working are built as well as plantation to provide food to community.
Counting the chief justice and the associate justices, the amount of individuals
that make up the supreme court would be :
9 individuals
the answer is option B
hope this helps
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Deborah Sampson disguised by the name of a man, Robert Shurtleff and fought in the revolution.
