<span>No2 would be the free radical as it has an unpaired electron in it's grouping. Since free radicals are defined by the attribute of having an unpaired electron in their make-up, no2 fits this definition.</span>
ANSWER: uh yehh because basically when you know because it happened and also yeah. yes
The answer would be the first option which is it overruled “cash and carry” allowing the US
to lend weapons and supplies to countries vigorous to the protection of the US.
It was envisioned to dismiss the weight on US forces and let
other countries to protect themselves within their own nation. Hitler was in
disarray, and it was not unavoidably by his own selecting, and the associates
just couldn't reply at that time. The main recipient to lend lease was Russia.
Answer:
It’s impossible to agree or disagree because the English translation of the Chinese original doesn’t lead to the same perceived interpretation.
The Chinese original refers to generational integrity and solidarity. It is not about ‘family’ in the ordinary Western sense of the word. The Chinese original abstracts the ‘family’ to non-family conceptualisations such as the state, the monarch, lordships, etc.
The quote is not really about ‘family.’
Virtually every Chinese person today understands what that quote is about, yet not many Westerners do. The translation ‘family’ should really have been ‘home,’ but home in the abstract sense.
The original was in the sense of solidarity and uniformity of the echelon of decision-makers in an organisation.
At the time of Confucius, the typical Chinese household had three or four generations of people living together.
Confucius was talking about the principle of the household decision-making defers to the seniors. In times of trouble and turmoil, this makes for solid reinforcement of uniformity of decisions, actions and assistance.
Explanation:
I hope it helped!
