Answer:
pag-uusap sa pagitan ng dalawa o higit pang mga tao bilang tampok ng isang libro, dula, o pelikula
Explanation:
I am not trying to offend anyone, but this is what I say: The Bible, (and therefor the Qur' an, Vedus, etc.) is nothing but a book. It was writen by a man, and a man only. My evidence is because there are alterations in every holy book of each major religion. There are some things that are taken out and rewriten to apease a ciertain religon's ways. Therefore implying that any religion's holy script is not the word of god.
Hope this helps! Tell me if there is somthing wrong. And again, I'm not trying to offend anyone.
Have a nice day!
True, because their impact can be passed on through generations even if the waste is removed
According to the result of the test statistic, the p-values are given by:
a) 0.0352.
b) 0.9648.
c) 0.0704.
<h3>How to find the p-value of a test?</h3>
It depends on the test statistic z, as follows.
- For a left-tailed test, it is the area under the normal curve to the left of z, which is the <u>p-value of z</u>.
- For a right-tailed test, it is the area under the normal curve to the right of z, which is <u>1 subtracted by the p-value of z.</u>
- For a two-tailed test, it is the area under the normal curve to the left of -z combined with the area to the right of z, hence it is <u>2 multiplied by 1 subtracted by the p-value of z.</u>
In this problem, the test statistic is z = 1.8, which has a p-value of 0.9648.
Item a:
Right-tailed test, hence the p-value is of 1 - 0.9648 = 0.0352.
Item b:
Left-tailed test, hence the p-value is of 0.9648.
Item c:
Two-tailed test, hence the p-value is of 2 x (1 - 0.9648) = 2 x 0.0352 = 0.0704.
You can learn more about p-values at brainly.com/question/13873630
The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.
The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made". It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.
