#1 farmers piled up debt, over produced food causing prices to fall.
industry produced more than was bought, many items bought on credit
disparity in wealth; few getting wealthy and not spending enough to match the production output
<span>prices declined, people panis and sold stock and took money out of the banks
</span>#2 in beginning, had a hands-off policy
then adopted a volunteerism policy but business and labor did not work together
local and state governments did not have resources to help people on a local level
created RFC to get loans to businesses but funds did not trickle doen to citizens
unemployment and homelessness high
<span>Hoover did not reaction quickly enough and relied too much on local, state, and private efforts to fix the economic problems
</span>
Merry Christmas!
Well I don't see any options so my guess would be:
Don't pick any opinions because if your writing a research paper then you should have your paper based off of facts and things you have seen off of the internet.
Hope this helps and Have a wonderful day!
I’m not sure which reformers you’re referring. However, most reformers during the stated time period gained support through the press or by word of mouth. Ambient bars and beer halls were a good place for politics to be discussed during the time period. They could have printed their information, or done speeches and events in the public square. (Public square referring to bars, halls, gatherings, or even public protests) at the time boss napping was actually a form of protest in France and other European countries on a smaller scale.
Hundreds of jobs, new economic development, and also major stock changes. It also brought city crises.
