Answer:
C. He forced artists to remove his enemies from pictures.
Explanation:
It is well known that in Photographs and Paintings, Stalin would "erase", People in his regime that were either considered his Enemies/Rivals which due to his paranoid suspicions during the Great Purge that occurred from 1936-1938. Such removal of Political Enemies could happen from either something as major as Sympathizing or Working with a rival like Leon Trotsky, Or a simple disagreement of policy or idea. But never the less Stalin erased many of his Commissars and Government officials that were in photo's or painting's with him as to give off a portrayal that Stalin was "Infallible" and could do no wrong , Reinforcing his Cult of Personality. This practice continued well after Stalin's death, Continuing as far as the fall of the Union in 1991.
<span>The terms failed to clarify the fate of the emperor.
</span>The US wanted to end the war, and they felt the only options were to either use the atomic bomb, or stage an invasion of mainland Japan. The invasion of Japan called for massive numbers of troops that had been serving in Europe to join the forces fighting in the Pacific theater. The government of Japan was fanatical and was not likely to surrender unless it could no longer wage war. Casualty estimates for the American forces were staggering, coming to a number of 500,000. President Truman and his advisors deemed this an unacceptable cost and <span>therefore decided to drop the atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima to force</span>
The industrial revolution brought the United States to where we are today. Specifically it helped create more jobs and easier manufacturing. It also helped the economy of the west improve greatly. With all the new inventions people started to become more creative and open to newer ideas. It also helped communication and transportation which was a big deal since we had acquired a ton of new land.
<span>a revolution from above is more likely to produce liberal democracy</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Why the News Is Not the Truth
by Peter Vanderwicken
From the Magazine (May–June 1995)
Tweet
Post
Share
Save
Buy Copies
Print
News and the Culture of Lying: How Journalism Really Works, Paul H. Weaver (The Free Press, 1994).
Who Stole the News?: Why We Can’t Keep Up with What Happens in the World, Mort Rosenblum (John Wiley & Sons, 1993).
Tainted Truth: The Manipulation of Fact in America, Cynthia Crossen (Simon & Schuster, 1994).
The U.S. press, like the U.S. government, is a corrupt and troubled institution. Corrupt not so much in the sense that it accepts bribes but in a systemic sense. It fails to do what it claims to do, what it should do, and what society expects it to do.
The news media and the government are entwined in a vicious circle of mutual manipulation, mythmaking, and self-interest. Journalists need crises to dramatize news, and government officials need to appear to be responding to crises. Too often, the crises are not really crises but joint fabrications. The two institutions have become so ensnared in a symbiotic web of lies that the news media are unable to tell the public what is true and the government is unable to govern effectively. That is the thesis advanced by Paul H. Weaver, a former political scientist (at Harvard University), journalist (at Fortune magazine), and corporate communications executive (at Ford Motor Company), in his provocative analysis entitled News and the Culture of Lying: How Journalism Really Works.
