Answer:
Growth rate 2.4%
Explanation:
MV=D1/(Ke-g)
Where MV=share market value=$15
D1=Dividend at year end=$.72
Ke=stock's expected rate of return=7.2%
By putting above values in formula, we get;
MV=D1/(Ke-g)
15=.72/(7.2%-g)
15*7.2%-15g=.72
1.08-15g=.72
.72-1.08=-15g
g= -.36/-15
g=2.4%
Answer:
Osaka ROI is 28%
Yokohama ROI is 18%
Explanation:
The formula for return on investment =net income/average operating assets*100
For Osaka division:
net income is $749,000
average operating assets is $2,675,000
return on investment=$749,000/$2,675,000*100
=28%
For Yokohama
net income is $3,330,000
average operating assets is $18,500,000
return on investment=$3,330,000/$18,500,000
=18%
Even though Yokohama has a higher net operating income ,the Osaka division recorded a better performance using ROI as a performance metric,which shows profit computation is an absolute figure which does not consider the amount of resources invested in order to earn the profit
An allergist cannot be a primary care provider.
Yes, it is fair. Younger people (Below 18) need to focus more on school. Work can take their attention off of school. And without school they wont be able to get a better job. Plus younger people can only work part time due to child labor. Most workers below 18 also have parents that's job is to feed and care for them, which means they do not even need to work until they are over 18. most people that work under the age of 18 is just for the fact of having money, not because they need it to live.
I have no ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
