1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
egoroff_w [7]
3 years ago
13

PART A: One of the direct results of the decision to drop

History
1 answer:
Delvig [45]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A President Truman learned of the success of the Manhattan Project

Explanation:

American President Harry Truman made the decision to use the devastating atomic bomb on Japan as a direct response to the Pear Harbor attack on American soil.

The direct result of this was that the Japanese gave their unconditional surrender and the war was ended.

However, the indirect result of the decision to drop the atomic bomb was that President Truman learned of the success of the Manhattan project which was the atomic bomb.

You might be interested in
What political strategy did senators Eugene McCarthy and Robert Kennedy employ to try to end the Vietnam war
arsen [322]

McCarthy and Kennedy ran for the Democratic presidential nomination.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Japan can afford to import agricultural products that cannot be grown locally because it has an advanced __________ economy
4vir4ik [10]
<span>technological is your answer 


</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Classical civilizations developed________, whereas early river civilizations did not.
e-lub [12.9K]
Classical civilizations developed vast empires
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How can the judicial branch check or stop an action of the legislative branch?​
Dvinal [7]

Answer:The legislative branch makes laws, but the President in the executive branch can veto those laws with a Presidential Veto. The legislative branch makes laws, but the judicial branch can declare those laws unconstitutional.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Civil rights activists challenged Southern voting laws because they conflicted with
IRISSAK [1]
Civil rights activists challenged southern voting laws because they conflicted with the activists belief that all people had a right to vote, for example, in Georgia, Black people could not vote in the primary election for the governor, sure they could vote in the general but by then it was only one candidate left.<span />
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • "despite his loss in the election, how did lincoln become the leader of the republican party?"
    12·1 answer
  • Which of thewhy reasons England sponsored exploration?
    9·1 answer
  • What must people have if they are to act
    12·1 answer
  • Which historic figure is correctly paired with the
    8·1 answer
  • The ability to make decisions for the people
    9·2 answers
  • Heyy! i’ll give brainliest please help
    10·2 answers
  • 1. What are some perspectives of cultural contact?
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    9·1 answer
  • Early humans got their clothing from _____.<br><br> rocks<br> animals<br> leafy plants
    10·1 answer
  • Besides land, what did the United States gain from expansion? (USE THE MAP ABOVE TO EXPLAIN WHAT WE GAINED) Use information from
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!