Answer:
Major General Andrew Jackson fought the Battle of New Orleans for a number of reasons. First is that neither the British not Jackson and his men had heard that the two warring sides had already signed a treaty to end the hostilities in Ghent, Belgium on December 24th, 1814. Also, Jackson had been a prisoner of the British during the American Revolution and he was said to still hold a lot of personal animosity towards them for that reason.
Explanation:
Jackson had declared martial law in New Orleans and called on anyone and everyone to try to defend the city from the British incursion. Skirmishes began on Dec 23rd, 1814 and culminated in the Battle of New Orleans on the 8th of January, 1815. The American group of militia fighters and whomever else was prepared to defend the city were able to outwit the British who suffered many casualties despite the upper hand they had in terms of tactics and equipment.
In each case naturally the intention for the first action existed, or it would not have been carried out. It is doubtful in the extreme that the initiators of those actions foresaw the full consequences of those actions, especially as the full scale of the consequences did not become apparent for hundreds of years.
<span>So in all three cases the answer must be that the consequences were not intentional.</span>
Could you tell us what war ?
Answer:
Absolute refractory period
Explanation:
The absolute refractory period is short in an action potential. During the refractory period, there is no occurrence of another action potential. There would occur two types of refractory periods
Absolute refractory periods: Absolute period is the period when another action potential won't occur immediately after a first action potential. This refractory period also called an effective refractory period. This period happened because the sodium channel is inactivated and is stable in the same way until the hyper polarization does not occur.
Relative refractory period:
