1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Otrada [13]
3 years ago
6

In both Australia and New Zealand, the governor-general has a large amount of official authority, including the right to appoint

many officials. Why is the governor-general not considered to be the most powerful position in either of these countries?
Social Studies
1 answer:
pochemuha3 years ago
4 0
<span>The governor-general in both New Zealand and Australia do indeed have a lot of official authority. However, they are not the most powerful people in their respective countries. This is because the governor-general of Australia and New Zealand are representatives of the Monarchy. The current ruler of the monarchy is the Queen of England. They are directly responsible to the Queen. There are currently 6 governor-generals in Australia. The Prime Minister in Australia and New Zealand are considered the most powerful politicians. </span>
You might be interested in
What were some of the accomplishments of Chaldean astronomers ?
jekas [21]
<span>They recorded their observations of the stars and made maps showing the position of the planets and the phases of the moon. The Babylonians also believed in astrology, the belief that the placement of the stars influences a person’s life. The Chaldeans, adding to the work of earlier civilizations, contributed to the science of astronomy.In fact, they built Ziggourats which were huge tours with many steps.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Please help me with these four True or false questions.
ycow [4]

true false false true

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select all that apply.
Virty [35]
To learn how the past connects to the presents and effects the future
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write any five demerits of electoral competition
Elina [12.6K]

<u>The following are the demerits of electoral competition:</u>

  • It creates arguments between societies and one part of the society may get divided into more sub-fractions.
  • With the urge to win electoral fights, long term policies do not get formed.
  • Political parties point allegations against each other.
  • The parties may play dirty politics to win.
  • Because of the dirty tricks' parties use, good people do not get into politics to serve the country.
  • The government money is misused by the present leaders to win the election.
3 0
3 years ago
Each discovery or invention leads<br> to many<br> other. Justify the statement.
JulsSmile [24]
It states that when you discover something new you will most certainly find something that is more advanced than it. Which comes from humans instinct of curiosity
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Calcium carbonate is a compound that is used to make chalk for drawing on rocks or pavement. One molecule has one atom of calciu
    8·2 answers
  • Before paul went out of town he asked his neighbor to stop by to water his lawn. his neighbor was happy to agree. this type of h
    13·1 answer
  • The job function of a news commentator is most similar to that of an:
    13·2 answers
  • The layers of rock may be relatively dated, from youngest to oldest
    9·1 answer
  • What does creating and following a personal budget help people do?
    12·2 answers
  • Please answer this i dont know this its a social studies question
    13·2 answers
  • Was the declaration of independence the first legal document to limit the power of a monarchy ?
    15·1 answer
  • the correlation between two measures obtained on a group of individuals is graphically represented as a
    10·1 answer
  • Define sculpture. <br><br>ok define​
    11·2 answers
  • Which design principle is the subject of a photo or image
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!