Answer:
Explanation:
easy work, i did it really easy
It uses archival sources and periodicals to examine the Christian and although after reading thousands of pages of religious polemics,it be 2008 Bruce Masters,Christian and Jews in the Ottoman
The Catholic Church responded to the Protestant Reformation thru a Counter reform, rebuilding the Church by finishing corruption in all forms. This is obvious thru three examples:
1. Ending monastic corruption.
2. Implementing formal schooling for priests, especially the Jesuits.
3. Reaffirming the magisterium of the Church in topics of biblical interpretation.
<h3>What do you mean by Reformation?</h3>
The Reformation (as a substitute named the Protestant Reformation or the European Reformation)become a primary motion inside Western Christianity in 16th-century Europe that posed a spiritual and political challenge to the Catholic Church.
Therefore, The Catholic Church responded to the Protestant Reformation thru a Counter reform, rebuilding the Church by finishing corruption in all forms.
Learn more about Reformation:
brainly.com/question/369126
#SPJ1
During the period of the Renaissance, Italy was divided into numerous small city-states controlled by local wealthy people. There were large differences though from one city-state to another, and while the northern ones were very wealthy and had things going very smoothly, the southern ones were much less successful.
The reason why the northern Italian city-states were so wealthy was mostly the trade. These city-states had excellent large ports. They were producing multiple things that were in high demand and also very well paid for for export, and were getting lot of things they needed and desired from the other parts of the world.
These states had very well developed fleets, and they were trading with multiple Asian regions, Europe, as well as parts of Africa. They were exporting their high quality products. Very often they were buying certain things from one place, then re-sell it in other place buy much higher prices, thus getting more and more wealth over time. That wealth enabled them to get all they needed without any problem, thus making them very stable and strong small states.
If the story of "All Quiet on the Western Front" was told today, the story would be much different, especially if it was told from the viewpoint of an American soldier involved in the War on Terror. First, the protagonist would not be coming from a nation that is in a state of total war. The War on Terror is a limited war and does not require the undivided focus of the American government, industry, and economy. A soldier, today, would likely be volunteering to join the military, instead of being all but forced to like the characters in "All Quiet on the Western Front." Second, the total detachment the soldiers in "All Quiet on the Western Front" feel from their civilian lives would not be as pronounced, given how today's soldiers are able to communicate with their friends and family back home by way of email, online chat, and quicker postal service. Thirdly, today's American soldiers are provided with far better and more extensive military training than the soldiers in "All Quiet on the Western Front" are, hence they would be more prepared for the combat experiences they must endure.
