Answer:
nowledge from any time period will always be helpful in some way. We are able to accomplish several things with the more knowledge we know. Knowledge from the past is still useful for is today for the reason that it can help us in present situations.
Information found in the past can teach us how to improve modern technology. Ideas are always being changed due to knowledge of the past such as changing from riding a horse to riding a car or from cooking on top of a fire to cooking on a stove. The knowledge from the past helped in the creation of modern ideas/creations.
Knowledge of the past will continue to be useful for us today and for us in the future. We will learn from past knowledge and use what we learned to create and help us in certain situations. Knowledge is a great gift and shall always be used to help the human race.
Explanation:
I hope this helps u! :D
Answer;
The two generally operate separately, although federal courts may overrule state court decisions that violate the US Constitution or federal law.
Explanation;
-The differences between federal and state courts are defined mainly by jurisdiction. Jurisdiction refers to the kinds of cases a court is authorized to hear.
-State courts have broad jurisdiction, so the cases individual citizens are most likely to be involved in; such as robberies, traffic violations, broken contracts, and family disputes; are usually tried in state courts.
-Federal court jurisdiction, by contrast, is limited to the types of cases listed in the Constitution and specifically provided for by Congress.
-State and local courts are established by a state (within states there are also local courts that are established by cities, counties, and other municipalities, which we are including in the general discussion of state courts). Federal courts are established under the U.S. Constitution to decide disputes involving the Constitution and laws passed by Congress.
Answer:
The Civil Code of 1804, systemizing family and property law, denied a woman all civil and political rights, banished her from professions, and did not allow her even to enter into a contractual agreement without the written consent of her husband or father, much less to live outside of his domicile.
Explanation:
hope this helps