1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Eva8 [605]
3 years ago
13

How did the Tariff of 1828 continue to haunt Jackson's presidency?

History
1 answer:
Galina-37 [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:The Tariff of Abominations was the name outraged southerners gave to a tariff passed in 1828. Residents of the South believed the tax on imports was excessive and unfairly targeted their region of the country.

The tariff, which became law in the spring of 1828, set very high duties on goods imported into the United States. And by doing so it did create major economic problems for the South. As the South was not a manufacturing center, it had to either import finished goods from Europe (primarily Britain) or buy goods made in the North.

Adding insult to injury, the law had obviously been devised to protect manufacturers in the Northeast. With a protective tariff essentially creating artificially high prices, the consumers in the South found themselves at a severe disadvantage when buying products from either Northern or foreign manufacturers.

The 1828 tariff created a further problem for the South, as it reduced business with England. And that, in turn, made it more difficult for the English to afford cotton grown in the American South.

Intense feeling about the Tariff of Abominations prompted John C. Calhoun to anonymously write essays setting forth his theory of nullification, in which he forcefully advocated that states could ignore federal laws. Calhoun's protest against the federal government eventually led to the Nullification Crisis.

Background of the 1828 Tariff

The Tariff of 1828 was one of a series of protective tariffs passed in America. After the War of 1812, when English manufacturers began to flood the American market with cheap goods that undercut and threatened new American industry, the U.S. Congress responded by setting a tariff in 1816. Another tariff was passed in 1824.

Those tariffs were designed to be protective, meaning they were intended to drive up the price of imported goods and thereby protect American factories from British competition. And they became unpopular in some quarters because the tariffs were always promoted originally as being temporary measures. Yet, as new industries emerged, new tariffs always seemed necessary to protect them from foreign competition.

The 1828 tariff actually came into being as part of a complicated political strategy designed to cause problems for President John Quincy Adams. Supporters of Andrew Jackson hated Adams following his victory in the "Corrupt Bargain" election of 1824.

The Jackson people drew up legislation with very high tariffs on imports necessary to both the North and South, on the assumption that the bill would not pass. And the president, it was assumed, would be blamed for the failure to pass the tariff bill. And that would cost him among his supporters in the Northeast.

The strategy backfired when the tariff bill passed in Congress on May 11, 1828. President John Quincy Adams signed it into law. Adams believed the tariff was a good idea and signed it though he realized it could hurt him politically in the upcoming election of 1828.

The new tariff imposed high import duties on iron, molasses, distilled spirits, flax, and various finished goods. The law was instantly unpopular, with people in different regions disliking parts of it, but the opposition was greatest in the South.

John C. Calhoun's Opposition to the Tariff of Abominations

The intense southern opposition to the 1828 tariff was led by John C. Calhoun, a dominating political figure from South Carolina. Calhoun had grown up on the frontier of the late 1700s, yet he had been educated at Yale College in Connecticut and also received legal training in New England.

In national politics, Calhoun had emerged, by the mid-1820s, as an eloquent and dedicated advocate for the South (and also for the institution of slavery, upon which the economy of the South depended).

Calhoun's plans to run for president had been thwarted by lack of support in 1824, and he wound up running for vice president with John Quincy Adams. So in 1828, Calhoun was actually the vice president of the man who signed the hated tariff into law.

Calhoun Published a Strong Protest Against the Tariff

In late 1828 Calhoun wrote an essay titled "South Carolina Exposition and Protest," which was anonymously published. In his essay Calhoun criticized the concept of a protective tariff, arguing that tariffs should only be used to raise revenue, not to artificially boost business in certain regions of the nation. And Calhoun called South Carolinians "serfs of the system," detailing how they were forced to pay higher prices for necessities.

Explanation: thancks

You might be interested in
Was general haig a good leader?
Brums [2.3K]

ANSWER:

yes he was, he was a hero to the people for winning for british in wwI.

3 0
3 years ago
It looks like it is going to rain today there are a lot of clouds in the sky the sun is not shining I will play inside if it rai
SpyIntel [72]
Your right very right
4 0
3 years ago
The goal of the pendleton act and the hatch act was to:
ivolga24 [154]
The answer is Reduce political influence over federal government employees

I hope that helped
6 0
3 years ago
What was the fate of most forty-niners who went to california in search of riches in the gold fields?
dimaraw [331]
<span>Most did not strike it rich, but they remained in California and bettered the state's infrastructure. This was because they were a ready labor force, and the amount of gold in the gold fields had been wildly exaggerated. There just was not enough gold for all of the forty niners to strike it rich.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Why did you think that Rainsford chooses to confront Zaroff in the end, rather than simply ambush him?
NeTakaya

Answer:

He wants Zaroff to feel like he's being hunted.  Rainsford has now tracked him down and his him on an even playing field.  Zaroff is now the one who has to fight to stay alive.  Aside from this, I think an ambush would be pretty difficult.  Rainsford is unarmed and Zaroff is tucked away somewhere in his great chateau.  A sneak attack probably wouldn't be successful.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who taught thousands of Cherokee how to read and write?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did willson have touble convincing the other allied powers to agree with his plan
    8·1 answer
  • What political actions resulted from opposition to the vietnam war?​
    6·1 answer
  • Which city in the USA held the first city wide Halloween celebration?
    9·1 answer
  • After independence, what did each former colony first need to do?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was President Andrew Johnson charged with breaking the Tenure of<br> Office Act?
    8·1 answer
  • At the time of the Brown v. Board of Education decision,
    12·1 answer
  • What was the most powerful weapon used in the revolutionary war?
    9·1 answer
  • discuss 3 practical strategies that You can implement to avoid spreading provocative take news during service delivery protests​
    11·1 answer
  • Which describes the Boston Massacre?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!