Answer:
Ok the number of earthworms is 30 and if it is not 30 it would be 40.
That statement is False
According to the data from United States' <span>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the percentage of the infertil couple is around 12%.
Which means that if it converted into a fraction, it would be around 1 in 8 couples, Not 1 in 4.</span>
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Hanuman the Hindu monkey god is the most worshipped god in Hindu religion. There are many stories behind lord hanuman. In one of the interpretation shiva and Parvati decide to transform themselves into monkeys and indulge in amorous games in the forest. As a result of Parvati becomes pregnant. Shiva was conscious of goldy responsibilities and desiring to conform to the law of nature, direct the wind god Vayu to carry the offering from Parvati womb that of Anjana an Apsara with the form of a monkey prayed to be granted a child boy. In another version of the story, he is the son of the king of Vayu and Anjana.
Answer:
The correct answers would be Continuous and Partial.
Explanation:
A trainer wants a pigeon to quickly learn to peck a button to obtain food. She also wants to be sure the behavior is resistant to extinction. So she should use Continuous Reinforcement until the response is mastered followed by Partial Reinforcement.
Continuous reinforcement is the reinforcement of behavior each time it occurs, whereas partial reinforcement is when the behavior is reinforced only some times.
Because the trainer wants to be sure that the behavior is resistant to extinction, so to make it interesting, she should use continuous reinforcement until the pigeon is trained, and then partial reinforcement should be used to keep the interest.
Answer:
C. You have a comparative advantage in picking apples
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while chosing am alternative.
Comparative Advantage refers to when one can do a task with less opportunity cost (other output / task sacrificed).
Opportunity cost of apples picked is the cherries sacrifised . If 'I' can pick apples at lower opportunity cost (sacrifising lesser cherries), i am more efficient in picking apples . So, I have Comparitive advantage in apple picking, than my neighbour .
There is no sufficient information about my neighbour's opportunity cost of picking cherries and his/ her comparitive advantage in that . And apple cherry trade between me & my neighbour will also be based on his / her comparitive advantage also. So that also can't be determined .
Only my comparative advantage in apples is surely determined .
