Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Many constitutional monarchies started out as, would be: Absolute monarchies.
Explanation:
The big difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy, is the limitations placed on the power exercised by a monarch, or head ruler, of a country. In ancient times, this became the norm, especially in Europe, where the absolute power of kings was unquestioned and unchecked by anyone. However, even if kingdoms all over the world started out as absolute monarchies, with the King or Queen being the only law in the land, this changed through time, until these rulers became bound by another law; that of a constitution. This is the case of England, and other such nations, where government went from being solely in the hands of a ruler, to the ruler´s power being chained by constitutions. Today, many of the monarchies only have Kings and Queens as symbols, but they play no part in government.
Answer:He unified small English kingdoms against the Danes.
Explanation:
The Founding Fathers, the framers of the Constitution, wanted to form a government that did not allow one person to have too much authority or control. ... With this in mind the framers wrote the Constitution to provide for a separation of powers, or three separate branches of government.
They mummified people who had the money. :)
Based on the options given, the most likely answer to this query is the behavioral approach system Bas and the behavioral inhibition system are the basis of personalityThank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
