Between
Georgia Land Lottery
Georgia Land Lottery
1805 and 1833, the state of Georgia conducted eight land lotteries (one each in 1805, 1807, 1820, 1821, 1827, and 1833 and two in 1832) in which public lands in the interior of the state were dispersed to small yeoman farmers (i.e., farmers who cultivate their own land) based on a system of eligibility and chance. During the twenty-eight years in which the lottery operated, Georgia sold approximately three-quarters of the state to about 100,000 families and individuals for minuscule amounts of money.
Answer:
A, for sure... also if so can i have brainliest... much apreciated
Explanation:
Scarcity is one of the most important aspects of business and economics. It has the potential to affect how businesses utilize resources, manufacture their products and address their personnel requirements. Understanding scarcity and how it could affect you is essential for successfully managing a business.
Easy =) its a buddhist statue
Suppose that at prices of $5, $4, $3, $2, and $1 for product Z, the corresponding quantities supplied are 7, 6, 5,4,3 units, res
Alchen [17]
Answer:
A)Improved technology for producing Z.
Explanation:
- which means automation of production, so when you will have mass production at low cost it will definitely result in a decrease of product cost.
- This shall consequently lead to an increase of the quantities of product Z produced because, the extra capital that comes from saving on the production costs shall be used to produce more goods.
- Since production shall have not cost any extra capital, the price shall remain constant.
India is suddenly in the news for all the wrong reasons. It is now hitting the headlines as one of the most unequal countries in the world, whether one measures inequality on the basis of income or wealth.
So how unequal is India? As the economist Branko Milanovic says: “The question is simple, the answer is not.” Based on the new India Human Development Survey (IHDS), which provides data on income inequality for the first time, India scores a level of income equality lower than Russia, the United States, China and Brazil, and more egalitarian than only South Africa.
According to a report by the Johannesburg-based company New World Wealth, India is the second-most unequal country globally, with millionaires controlling 54% of its wealth. With a total individual wealth of $5,600 billion, it’s among the 10 richest countries in the world – and yet the average Indian is relatively poor.
Compare this with Japan, the most equal country in the world, where according to the report millionaires control only 22% of total wealth.
In India, the richest 1% own 53% of the country’s wealth, according to the latest data from Credit Suisse. The richest 5% own 68.6%, while the top 10% have 76.3%. At the other end of the pyramid, the poorer half jostles for a mere 4.1% of national wealth.
What’s more, things are getting better for the rich. The Credit Suisse data shows that India’s richest 1% owned just 36.8% of the country’s wealth in 2000, while the share of the top 10% was 65.9%. Since then they have steadily increased their share of the pie. The share of the top 1% now exceeds 50%.
This is far ahead of the United States, where the richest 1% own 37.3% of total wealth. But India’s finest still have a long way to go before they match Russia, where the top 1% own a stupendous 70.3% of the country’s wealth.
