Research on gender differences would lead one to anticipate that Alex is "less" likely to detect faint odors and "less" likely to smile frequently than his sister Shayna.
Men and females enormously vary in their perceptual assessment of odors, with ladies outflanking men on numerous sorts of smell tests. Women’s unrivaled olfactory capacity is a fundamental characteristic that has been acquired and afterward kept up all through evolution, a thought communicated by Romanian dramatist Eugene Ionesco when he said "a nose that can see is worth two that sniff."
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
Explanation:
The idea in this question is to identify the most vulnerable argument, for which it is possible to conclude that The first argument is only base in the opinion of the theorists and critics and there is no clear evidence or facts to prove the statement. It only states because of someone's opinion “no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist” simply the argument is false. This results as a fallacy since it is an argument without evidence to show that it is valid.
The cottage industry paid peasants to produce products
Frankly, I think that the motives of the conquistador lies in their name. These men wanted to conquer "the other," that which was in front of them. They did not come in peaceful harmony. Their motives were to conquer and capture that which existed in their path to extolling their own glory, and that of nation in a secondary capacity. The Conquistador use of force through the military reveals that their motives were to control New lands and native populations.
