1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yarga [219]
3 years ago
14

In the case Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shout

ing fire in a theater and causing panic." Which of the following rights was limited in this case?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Ket [755]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>

Explanation:

  • Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
  • However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
  • Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
You might be interested in
The United States remained neutral in WWI, but joined the Allies after
yKpoI14uk [10]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which of these is a power found in the state constitution?
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements accurately explains how Earth's atmosphere supports life?
Murljashka [212]
A. Earths atmosphere contains 78 percent oxygen, which is essential for life.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If people believe their rights are being violated, they have the right to a fair and impartial hearing. This reflects the basic
olga2289 [7]

Answer:

i'd go with due process

Explanation:

The reason for this is that an impartial hearing doesn't have much to do with lifetime employment, free consent, or freedom of conscience. Then from privacy and due process, we can see that due process makes more sense because if their rights are being violated and they have an impartial hearing, this doesn't necessarily represent privacy (:

6 0
3 years ago
2. Language, religion, and dress are to cultural traits as, buildings, roads,
san4es73 [151]

Answer: cultural landscapes

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was the growth of the republic aided by the Roman army's use of legions in warfare?
    7·2 answers
  • What is madison's view of the inherent power potentials of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government? To w
    5·1 answer
  • About how many miles wide is the West Bank at 32 degrees North latitude?
    9·1 answer
  • In a 1997 experiment, participants were first asked whether the Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi died before or after a certain age,
    14·1 answer
  • What is carved into Plymouth Rock?
    8·1 answer
  • Elaine says that her favorite TV show's teenage star, Lauren, is an attractive teenager who is an apprentice to a forensic anthr
    10·1 answer
  • Which are examples of academic challenges? Check all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true about entrepreneurs?
    15·1 answer
  • what constitutional amendment protects a defendant from being put on trial a second time for the same instance of a crime?
    13·1 answer
  • Which disorder requires a biopsy for a definitive diagnosis?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!