1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mart [117]
3 years ago
10

Please help a friend out, I'm trying so hard rn not to have a mental breakdown, no fake answers or links or you will get reporte

d
I'll send points if I can figure it out after you answer, just please help

Create your own graphic organizer that compares and contrasts the Industrial Revolution with today's technological revolution. You will use your background knowledge from this unit to complete the portion about the Industrial Revolution, and you will use one source you found through your research to complete the portion about today's technological revolution.


Your organizer should address all of the items below.


The Industrial Revolution:


What were the causes?

What were the effects?

What were some problems that were a result?

What were some benefits that were a result?

Today's Technological Revolution:


What were the causes?

What were the effects?

What were some problems that were a result?

What were some benefits that were a result?

You should also include the source information about the article or text you selected through your research.


Click here for an example graphic organizer you may use for this assignment. Or, you can create your own graphic organizer and upload it in the space below. Click here to view the rubric for this assignment.
History
1 answer:
Elanso [62]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Historians have identified several causes for the Industrial Revolution, including: the emergence of capitalism, European imperialism, efforts to mine coal, and the effects of the Agricultural Revolution. Capitalism was a central component necessary for the rise of industrialization.

hope this helps.

You might be interested in
Women were banned from performing Kabuki dance in 1629 because many of the performers came from the "pleasure quarters" where pr
sesenic [268]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The shogunate was never liked or agreed with the kabuki and all the shame it brought, particularly the variety of the social classes which mixed at kabuki performances.

The Kabuki dance was banned because it was thought to be too erotic. Young boys also performed wakashū-kabuki, but they were eligible for prostitution, and soon banned wakashū-kabuki as well.

Kabuki switched to adult male actors, which were cross dressers, called yaro-kabuki, in the mid-1600s.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the slave trade so profitable?
zhannawk [14.2K]
By far the most financially profitable West Indian colonies in 1800 belonged to Britain. The handful of British individuals who became planters made small fortunes. This advantage was reinforced when France lost its most important colony, Saint Dominigue (now Haiti), to a slave revolt in 1791.

6 0
3 years ago
What are two of the ancient Chinese dynasties? Select all that apply.
Sidana [21]
The answer is a. Ming and b . Shang
8 0
3 years ago
Research about the cause and effect of the passage 19th amendment to the US constitution and explain to your reader why it is im
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

The 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted American women the right to vote, a right known as women's suffrage, and was ratified on August 18, 1920, ending almost a century of protest. ... Anthony and other activists, raised public awareness and lobbied the government to grant voting rights to women.

Explanation:

The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution protects the individual right to keep and bear arms.It was ratified on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights.

In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court affirmed for the first time that the right belongs to individuals, for self-defense in the home,while also including, as dicta, that the right is not unlimited and does not preclude the existence of certain long-standing prohibitions such as those forbidding "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing upon this right.

The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. Sir William Blackstone described this right as an auxiliary right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense and resistance to oppression, and the civic duty to act in concert in defense of the state. Any labels of rights as auxiliary must be viewed in the context of the inherent purpose of a Bill of Rights, which is to empower a group with the ability to achieve a mutually desired outcome, and not to necessarily enumerate or rank the importance of rights. Thus all rights enumerated in a Constitution are thus auxiliary in the eyes of Sir William Blackstone because all rights are only as good as the extent they are exercised in fact.

While both James Monroe and John Adams supported the Constitution being ratified, its most influential framer was James Madison. In Federalist No. 46, Madison wrote how a federal army could be kept in check by state militias, "a standing army ... would be opposed [by] a militia." He argued that state militias "would be able to repel the danger" of a federal army, "It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops." He contrasted the federal government of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he described as "afraid to trust the people with arms," and assured that "the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition".

By January 1788, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia and Connecticut ratified the Constitution without insisting upon amendments. Several amendments were proposed, but were not adopted at the time the Constitution was ratified. For example, the Pennsylvania convention debated fifteen amendments, one of which concerned the right of the people to be armed, another with the militia. The Massachusetts convention also ratified the Constitution with an attached list of proposed amendments. In the end, the ratification convention was so evenly divided between those for and against the Constitution that the federalists agreed to the Bill of Rights to assure ratification.

In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Supreme Court ruled that, "The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second Amendments [sic] means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government."

In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment did not protect weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia."

In the twenty-first century, the amendment has been subjected to renewed academic inquiry and judicial interest. In Heller, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision that held the amendment protects an individual's right to keep a gun for self-defense. This was the first time the Court had ruled that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual's right to own a gun.

In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court clarified that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Second Amendment against state and local governments. In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare."

The debate between various organizations regarding gun control and gun rights continues.

3 0
3 years ago
What title was given to the rulers of Iran in the Islamic world in the early modern era?
EastWind [94]

<span>The correct option is "A", "Shah".</span>

<span>Shah is a term actually derived from “Khshayathiya” which is a Persian word. Sometimes the word is used in another form of “Shahanshah” which means king of the kings. This title was taken up by the Pahlavi Dynasty in the twentieth century.</span>

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which was not an effect of the flood of 1927 on the state of Arkansas? A. created thousands of refugees B. increased trust in go
    7·1 answer
  • What group did the colonies organize to fight against Great Britain?
    15·1 answer
  • In which article of the US Constitution is the leadership of the executive branch authorized?
    9·1 answer
  • Based on this graph, what conclusion can someone draw? Voters were not interested in the issues in 2008. 2008 and 2012 were pres
    15·2 answers
  • What was the major cause of the growing middle class of government workers throughout the 1960s? I NEED HELP ASAP
    12·1 answer
  • 99 POINT QUESTION, PLUS BRAINLIEST!!!
    6·2 answers
  • How is a lack of education used to control a people in totalitarian regimes?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following were reasons that the Founding Fathers wished to protect the rights of the accused?
    13·2 answers
  • What was the Precedent in Edmund v. Florida? Please give me the correct answer.
    14·2 answers
  • ASAP PLZZZ HELP
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!