I wonder if you mean to write
in place of
...
If you meant what you wrote, then we have


If you meant to write
(the cube root of 256), then we could go on to have
![\sqrt[3]{256}=\sqrt[3]{16^2}=\sqrt[3]{(4^2)^2}=\sqrt[3]{4^4}=\sqrt[3]{4^3\cdot4}=4\sqrt[3]4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B256%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B16%5E2%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%284%5E2%29%5E2%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B4%5E4%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B4%5E3%5Ccdot4%7D%3D4%5Csqrt%5B3%5D4)
Because LP and NP are the same measure, that means that MP is a bisector. It bisects side LN and it also bisects angle LMN. Where MP meets LN creates right angles. What we have then thus far is that angle LMP is congruent to angle NMP and that angle LPM is congruent to angle NPM and of course MP is congruent to itself by the reflexive property. Therefore, triangle LPM is congruent to triangle NMP and side LM is congruent to side NM by CPCTC. Side LM measures 11.
Answer:
we can proove by ASA congruence or SAS congruence rule
Answer:
the answer 61 cups of chocolate
Step-by-step explanation:
briniest please
0x+2 =y
So technically x+2=y