Before the act of emancipation was approved in July 1776, the Thirteen Colonies and the Kingdom of Great Britain had been at war for more than a year. Relations between the two had deteriorated since 1763. The British Parliament enacted a series of measures to increase taxes in the colonies, such as the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Act of 1767. The Legislative Body considered that these regulations were a legitimate means for the colonies to pay a fair share for the costs of keeping them in the British Empire.
However, many settlers had developed a different concept of the empire. The colonies were not directly represented in the Parliament and the settlers argued that this legislative body had no right to assign taxes. This fiscal dispute was part of a greater divergence between the British and American interpretations of the Constitution of Great Britain and the scope of Parliament's authority in the colonies. The orthodox view of the British - dating back to the Glorious Revolution of 1688 - argued that Parliament had supreme authority throughout the empire and, by extension, everything that Parliament did was constitutional. However, in the colonies the idea had developed that the British Constitution recognized certain fundamental rights that the government could not violate, not even Parliament. After the laws of Townshend, some essayists even began to question whether the Parliament had any legitimate jurisdiction in the colonies. Anticipating the creation of the Commonwealth of Nations, in 1774 the American literati - among them Samuel Adams, James Wilson and Thomas Jefferson - discussed whether the authority of Parliament was limited only to Great Britain and that the colonies -which had their own legislatures- they should relate to the rest of the empire solely because of their loyalty to the Crown.
Answer:
hey man
Explanation:
this sort of thing is showed ios
The reason why Brutus particularly troubled that the power to tax has been granted to the federal government is: The legislative does not have power limitations as regard to laying taxes.
<h3>
Why Brutus particularly troubled that the power to tax has been granted to the federal government </h3>
Since the legislative branch does not have power limitations as regard to laying taxes, which is why Brutus was disturb because he felt the federal government could use this to collect taxes.
He also felt that if the federal government could use it to collect taxes, the federal government would be the ones to determine what the welfare of the nation as a whole.
Therefore The reason why Brutus particularly troubled that the power to tax has been granted to the federal government is: The legislative does not have power limitations as regard to laying taxes.
Learn more about Why Brutus particularly troubled that the power to tax has been granted to the federal government here:brainly.com/question/11046478
#SPJ1
Answer:
The English Bill of Rights created a constitutional monarchy in England, meaning the king or queen acts as head of state but his or her powers are limited by law. Under this system, the monarchy couldn't rule without the consent of Parliament, and the people were given individual rights
Explanation:
The correct answer is President Monroe and his Doctrine titled "the Monroe Doctrine"
