What is the answers to this math 3-3x6+2=

2 answers:

8 0

You have to do PEMDAS. You skip the P because there are no parenthesis, you skip the E because there are no exponents, you start with the M because this means multiplication, so 3x6 is 18, so now you have 3-18+2. You then skip the D because there is no division, so you go to A which is addition, so 18+2 is 20. then you have 3-20 which is -17

Hoochie [10]3 years ago

3 0

The answer to this question is 2 because 3-3=0×6=0+2=2

You might be interested in

A livestock pen is built in the shape of a rectangle that is 2 times as long as it is wide. The perimeter is 30 feet. If the mat

shutvik [7]

Answer:

$57.5 is the total cost to build the pen.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following in the question:

A livestock pen is built in the shape of a rectangle.

The length of rectangle is two times the width.

Let l be the length of rectangle and w be the width of rectangle. Thus, we can write

$l = 2w$

Perimeter = 30 feet

$\text{Perimeter of rectangle} = 30\\2\times (l\times w) = 30$

Putting values,

$2(2w + w) = 30\\6w = 30\\w = 5\\l = 2w = 10$

The length of rectangle is 10 feet and width of rectangle is 5 feet.

If the material used to build the pen is $ 1.75 per foot for the longer sides and $ 2.25 per foot for the shorter sides

Cost of building =

$=2\times(\text{Cost of length}\times \text{Length} + \text{Cost of width}\times \text{Width})\\=2\times(1.75\times 10 + 2.25\times 5)\\=57.5$

Thus, $57.5 is the total cost to build the pen.

7 0

3 years ago

A study was done on the batting averages for two baseball players: Hitmore and Bunter. Data were collected over a period of time

amm1812

Answer:

Both (B) and (C) are correct

Step-by-step explanation:

Explaining in simple terms, The Simpson's paradox simply describes a phenomenon which occurs when observable trends in a relationship, which are obvious during singular evaluation of the variables disappears when each of this relationships are combined. This is what played out when hitmire appears to d well on both of natyraknamd artificial turf when separately compared, but isn't the same when the turf data was combined. Also, performance may actually not be related to the turf as turf may Just be. a lurking variable causing a spurious association in performance.

4 0

3 years ago

Please help me answer this question. I have the answer but i don’t know how to get to it.

Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

what do you mean

Step-by-step explanation:

what do you mean

7 0

3 years ago

Which expression is eqivalent to 9a +12

koban [17]