The Emperors needed the church to maintain power
Hostile indians, starvation, poor leadership and government
No, it is generally false that the <span>Civil Rights movements of the 1950s and 1960s did not do much to help African-Americans, since in fact there were many laws passed during this time that made the lives of African Americans better. </span>
Answer:
Some ideas:
-beads were a thing they did because of religion
-beads signified power or importance or wisdom
-beads of a certain colour/shape/size might mean certain things, e. g. 'I have children' or I am a woman/man'(there might be different beads from different genders/types of people)
-they cared about how they looked
-they had festivals where they got dressed up
Answer:
Generally, white power structures responded to the Civil Rights Movement based on their geographic location. Thus, most southerners spoke out against this movement, while most northerners supported the cause. This situation was even transversal to the Democratic and Republican parties, since for example Lyndon Johnson, Democratic President who approved the Civil Rights Act in 1964, supported the movement while Orval Faubus, Governor of Arkansas for the same party, did not do so in absolute.
In general, the governors and mayors of the south of the country did everything possible to prevent the advancement and achievements of this movement, through imprisonment (such as in Birmingham, where Martin Luther King was imprisoned), police repression and various government restrictions.
In contrast, northern politicians and those in Washington generally had a more open and responsive stance, supporting the movement and believing in equal opportunities.
