1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex73 [517]
3 years ago
12

Carrying long loads: how far can a load extend behind your car before you are required to put a red light on both the right and

left side of the protruding load?
Law
1 answer:
Westkost [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

4 feet or more

Explanation:

According to the laws of Florida, when carrying loads, and the load extends 4 feet or more behind your car, then it must be clearly marked by a red light on both the right and left side of the protruding load.

Therefore, the correct answer is 4 feet or more.

You might be interested in
Why should a Notary Signing Agent learn about all the closing documents in a loan package if they are not allowed to provide adv
Olenka [21]

Answer:

search

Explanation:

it

4 0
3 years ago
Things about justice
Feliz [49]

Answer:

The components of criminal justice include police, prosecution, judiciary, prisons, probation, and parole.

The criminal justice system has multiple and often conflicting objectives: the interests of the victim have to be balanced with the due process rights of the defendant, the broader public interest, as well as considerations of cost effectiveness.

Preventing crime is at least as important as punishing offenders. The three kinds of situational crime prevention, like robbing a bank, involve increasing the effort that offenders must spend to commit a crime, increasing the risk of detection and reducing the rewards gained by criminal behaviour, for example by lowering the amount of cash held in a facility.

The key principles that guide the practice of criminal justice in Western nations include that criminal prosecution should remain a last resort, that criminal justice interventions should be the minimal response necessary (i.e. if a warning is sufficient, don’t send the offender to prison), and that the severity of the sentence should increase as the crime becomes more serious.

Of all crimes, only about 10 per cent are reported to the police. Reasons for that include that the crime was not that serious, it is felt that the police can’t do anything about it or that the victim is worried of not being believed

There are several different ways to punish an offender: financial penalties, community-based punishment (i.e. imprisonment), community service, a curfew, and a residence requirement, among others.

A suspended prison term is especially effective with young or first time offenders as the mere threat of punishment is often sufficient.

The judicial response to crime varies greatly from one society to another, even though the crime rates are similar. In Holland, for example, imprisonments account for about 7 per cent of all sentences imposed, whereas in the US about 70 per cent of sentences involve custody.

We expect our prisons to punish and to rehabilitate – we want offenders to come out as better people. But even if offenders had a change of mind after getting out of prison, their criminal record sticks with them forever and their employment prospects are greatly diminished, worsening the chances to lead a fulfilled life.

In England, it costs about £38,000 ($60,000) per year to house one prisoner. For this reason alone it is important to ensure that no-one is sent to prison unless it is absolutely necessary.

Explanation:

~Himiko Toga~

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
OJ Simpson's "Dream Team" of lawyers and
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

On June 12, 1994, Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman, were found dead at Brown's home. Prosecutors argued that Simpson killed his ex-wife and her lover out of jealousy. Prosecutors began by reporting Nicole Brown Simpson's call to the emergency center from 1989. In it, Nicole Brown said she was afraid Simpson would harm her. Prosecutors also came up with Simpson's DNA material and shoe prints from him, found at the scene of the crime. Dozens of experts stated that Simpson must have been at the scene of the crime. There was a lot of circumstantial scientific evidence.

Simpson hired a team of expensive attorneys led by Robert Shapiro and later Johnnie Cochran. Cochran was nationally known as a lawyer for (mainly black) celebrities and specialized in cases involving discrimination or police brutality. From the outset, the defense was based on the charge of racism. The lawyers claimed that Simpson had been a victim of police fraud by depositing evidence against Simpson at the crime scene. The leader of the investigation into the double murder (Mark Fuhrman) was called a racist by the defense, and the lawyers found footage in which Fuhrman had used the N word.

While prosecutors believed they had a solid case and expected a conviction, polls showed that a majority of black residents of the United States believed that Simpson had been a victim of police fraud. Most white residents of the United States were convinced of Simpson's guilt. As the jury's verdict drew closer, racial tension rose, and some politicians feared a repeat of the Los Angeles race riots a few years earlier. On October 3, 1995 Simpson was acquitted of murder by the jury.

6 0
3 years ago
Rodney is a crime scene investigator. He has completed a thorough search of the crime scene and collected and recorded the evide
il63 [147K]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it's *<u>final walk-through</u>*, and *<u>logs the evidence</u>*.

Explanation:

It's been a few years since I've taken the class, but I finished the class with my grade over 99% so I'm probably remembering this correctly.

EDIT: Emergency correction, Final Walk-Through is correct, Logs the Evidence is NOT. This narrows the second blank down to only two options, I'll leave it to whoever reads this to use common sense and guess between the two.

4 0
3 years ago
__________________________________: statues that protect rescuers from being sued for giving emergency care
joja [24]

Good Samaritan laws statues that protect rescuers from being sued for giving emergency care.

<h3>What is the Good Samaritan law?</h3>

Good Samaritan laws is known to be a  law that gives legal protection to individuals that are in need of assistance especially to those who are seen to be injured, ill, in peril, etc.

Therefore, Good Samaritan laws statues that protect rescuers from being sued for giving emergency care.

Learn more about Good Samaritan laws  from

brainly.com/question/22477589

#SPJ12

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What college is the best college for law?
    5·2 answers
  • What if the government in the United States was controlled by one individual who had the power to do whatever they wanted, whene
    8·1 answer
  • What form of social mobility occurs from one generation to the next?
    5·1 answer
  • Explain how public safety is met because police officers enforce the laws? Use examples of laws that are routinely broken on a d
    11·1 answer
  • The two main groupings of nations during World War II were the Allied Powers and the Axis Powers
    13·1 answer
  • ​A federal law regarding the labeling of pesticides directly conflicts with a state law. The state law will be rendered invalid
    5·1 answer
  • What is 2+2 i will flip shoit if you say 4 if you say 3 i give brainlyest
    6·1 answer
  • Guess what "THIS" is.​
    7·1 answer
  • In the United States, a winning defendant may recover legal fees from the losing party if they prove ____________.
    12·2 answers
  • What are five examples of infrastructure?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!