Answer: income effect of a price change.
Explanation: The income effect is known as the effect on real income when price changes, it can however be positive or negative. The income effect expresses the impact of increased purchasing power on consumption.
In this scenario, spending $10 for lunch, and you would like to purchase two cheeseburgers. When you get to the restaurant, you find out the price for cheeseburger has increased from $5 to $6, so you decide to purchase just one cheeseburger, this scenario best illustrates the income effect of a price change.
Answer:
The correct answer is c. Appraisal of the environment and comparison against established criteria.
Explanation:
Performance audit is defined as a systematic, multidisciplinary, independent and objective review of the operation, programs and projects carried out by an organization and focuses mainly on evaluation to determine if its management has performed in terms of economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
The performance audit emphasizes how the different areas of a company have impacted the target market with their actions, considering the relevant results and real progress in achieving the objectives and goals.
Among its main technical tools we can distinguish the matrix of results indicators, which allows to efficiently link the objectives of the company and the results expected to be obtained in each of them, as well as the measurement indexes necessary for its monitoring and evaluation.
I don’t know, probably because there is so much people in NY or maybe the shelter doesn’t allow children?
Answer:
The correct answer are: peripheral route; you do not have strong arguments for why your product is superior
Explanation:
The peripheral route, instead of examining the relevant arguments for the matter, individuals examine the message quickly or focus on simple indicators that help them decide whether to accept or reject the position advocated in the message. The elements that are peripheral to the arguments of the message are those that take center stage. These may include the communicator's physical attractiveness, the direct style of speaking, or the pleasant association between the message and the music that is heard in the background. Sometimes, the strength of the arguments is of secondary or almost null importance. Sometimes we lack the motivation, ability or time to reflect carefully. If we are disinterested, distracted or busy, we may not take the time to analyze the content of the message. Instead of analyzing whether the arguments are convincing, we will most likely follow the peripheral route, focusing on clues and indicators that activate automatic acceptance without too much cognitive processing. Peripheral processing allows communicators to design simple claims and messages to influence individuals. Although on many occasions this route may seem like the panacea of contemporary persuasion, the truth is that a good part of it is also carried out through mechanisms that involve careful and reflective considerations of the message's arguments, since, as we have indicated, When people have some motivation or are able to process messages, they are not based exclusively on peripheral cues and signals, or necessarily fall into the tricks of the persuader. When processing peripherally, people always rely on simple rules, to make decisions, "heuristic." For example the "heuristic" that experts should be believed and only for this reason accept the recommendation of a speaker, the heuristic "if many people think that something is good, then it should be" or those of reputation, consistency and security apparent in the argument. Peripheral and superficial processing does not produce profound and lasting changes of opinion. The effects of surface processing are ephemeral but relevant enough to convince an undecided voter or push a consumer towards the purchase of one or another product.
The answers are the following:
a.
Brandon:
$7,000 + [($10,000/4)×3¿= $8,500
Ryan:
$7,000 + [($10,000/4)×1¿= $7,500
b.
Brandon $7,000
Ryan <span>$7,000</span>
