All categories

3 years ago

Solve for the following by FACTORING: x2 + 11x + 28 = 0

Mathematics

2 answers:

Serhud [2]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Alternate forms:

(x + 4) (x + 7) = 0

(x + 11/2)^2 - 9/4 = 0

Solutions:

x = -7

x = -4

Step-by-step explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPSSS

Vera_Pavlovna [14]3 years ago

4 0

Step-by-step explanation:

(x+7)(x+4)

x = -4 and -7

have a nice night

You might be interested in

What is the total of the items already packed ? 95 g + 1.4 kg + 3 1/8 kg + 0.6 kg + 8580g

arlik [135]

If you add all of the numbers above together the answer you should get is 13800 grams

6 0

3 years ago

Do 5, 6, and 7 form a right triangle

bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

Therefore in this problem 7 is the larger length and should be the hypotenuse, and 5 and 6 should be the lengths of the other two sides. Calculating: √( 52+62) = √(25+36) = √61=7.82 ≠ 7 , Therefore this is not a right angle triangle based on the Pythagorean theorem. If statement is true, then it is a right triangle.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

What is the quotient if 4X x equals 7

eduard

The answer is 28 because the X is being multiplied by 4

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the area of a regular 15-gon with a perimeter of 90 m ?

7nadin3 [17]

We are given with a regular 15-gon with a perimeter of 90 meters. In this case, side length is equal to 90/15 or 6 m. The angle inside the center is 360/15 or 24 degrees. We determine the area of each triangle (15 of them) and just multiply by 15 to get the total area. The height of each triangle is tan (12) = 3/ h where h is equal to 14.11 meters. Hence the area is 0.5*14.11*6*15 or equal to 635.13 meters.

8 0

3 years ago

"Durable press" cotton fabrics are treated to improve their recovery from wrinkles after washing "Wrinkle recovery angle" measur

ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

At 5% there is significant evidence to reject the null hypothesis. You can conclude that there is a difference between the population mean of the wrinkle recovery angle of fabric treated with Permafresh and the population mean of the wrinkle recovery angle of fabric treated with Hylite.

X[bar]₁= 120.8 degrees

X[bar]₂= 162.75 degrees

S₁²= 14.5155 degrees

S₂²= 24.4727 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The study variable is X: wrinkle recovery angle for a fabric specimen.

There is a suspicion that there is a difference in recovery from wrinkles after washing between two products (Permafresh and Hilite). To test this suspicion two random samples of fabric, 5 were treated with Permafresh and 4 were treated with Hylite resulting in the data:

Sample 1 (Permafresh)

X₁: wrinkle recovery angle for a fabric specimen treated with Permafresh.

X₁~N(μ₁;σ₁²)

n₁= 5

124; 104; 142; 111; 123

Sample mean X[bar]₁= (∑x₁i)/n₁= 604/5= 120.8 degrees

Sample variance S₁²= $\frac{1}{(n₁-1)}$ [(∑x₁²i)-(∑x₁i)²/n₁] = $\frac{1}{4}$ [(73806)-(604)²/5]= 210.7 degrees²

S₁= 14.515 ≅ 14.52 degrees

Sample 2 (Hylite)

X₂: wrinkle recovery angre for a fabric specimen trated with Hylite.

X₂~N(μ₂;σ₂²)

n₂= 4

147; 199; 149; 156

Sample mean X[bar]₂= (∑x₂i)/n₂= 651/4= 162.75 degrees

Sample variance S₂²= $\frac{1}{(n₂-1)}$ [(∑x₂²i)-(∑x₂i)²/n₂] = $\frac{1}{3}$ [(107747)-(651)²/4]= 598.916 ≅ 598.92 degrees²

S₂= 24.472≅ 24.47 degrees

To test the suspicion that there is a difference between the winkle recovery angle on fabric samples treated with Permafresh and Hylite, the hypothesis is:

H₀: μ₁ = μ₂

H₁: μ₁ ≠ μ₂

α: 0.05

To test the difference between the population means, considering that only sample information is available and the size of both samples, the most appropriate statistic to use is a pooled t for independent samples (unknown but equal population variances):

t= (X[bar]₁ - X[bar]₂) - (μ₁ - μ₂) ~t $_{n_1+n_2-2}$

Sa√(1/n₁+1/n₂)

Sa²= (n₁-1)S₁² + (n₂-1)S₂² = (4*210.7)+(3*598.92) = 377.08

n₁ + n₂ - 2 5+4-2

Sa= 19.418≅ 19.42

t= (X[bar]₁ - X[bar]₂) - (μ₁ - μ₂) = (120.8-162.75) - 0 = -3.22

Sa√(1/n₁+1/n₂) 19.42√(1/5+1/4)

Using the critical region approach, this rejection region is two-tailed with critical values:

$t_{n_1+n_2-2; \alpha/2 } = t_{7; 0.025 } = -2.365$

$t_{n_1+n_2-2; 1- \alpha/2 } = t_{7; 0.975 } = 2.365$

If t ≤ -2.365 or t ≥2.365, then the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -2.365 < t < 2.365, then the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

Since the calculated t-value is less than the left critical value, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

I've calculated the p-value for the test: 0.0146

This p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, then, using this approach, the decision is also to reject the null hypothesis.

This means, that at 5% there is significant evidence to reject the null hypothesis. You can conclude that there is a difference between the population mean of the wrinkle recovery angle of fabric treated with Permafresh and the population mean of the wrinkle recovery angle of fabric treated with Hylite.

I hope it helps!

4 0

4 years ago