1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tju [1.3M]
3 years ago
10

THIS IS THE ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION, I GOT A 95% ON IT, PLEASE REPHRASE BECAUSE ED GENUITY WILL SEARCH THE INTERNET FOR PLAGIARI

SM
A) Identify ONE way that trade in some commodities was organized in the late 1800s and early 1900s that gave an economic advantage to merchants and companies in the United States, as shown in the cartoon.


B) Identify ONE similar way trade was organized in the same time period to benefit Europe.


C) Explain ONE consequence of this for one of the examples used in (A) or (B).



A) One way that trade in some commodities was organized in the late 1800s and early 1900s that gave an economic advantage to merchants and companies in the United States is that the US forcefully made countries nearby and in their control or influence to essentially exclusively trade with the US. The US controlled trade in much of the Western Hemisphere, and used their immense military power to police trade in the region. The phrase, as depicted in the cartoon, “speak softly and carry a big stick”, means that America should negotiate, but also show that they have a lot of military strength, without actually doing anything, unless absolutely necessary.


B) One similar way trade was organized in the same time period to benefit Europe was that European powers used their military strength to pressure other countries into trading with them. This was similar to the big stick policy, but they established colonies and controlled trade through that. European powers also forced Asian countries to establish ports so that they could trade there. The fundamental principles of both the American big stick policy and its European counterpart are the same, as they control trade in the regions they want to trade in with their military strength and influence.


C) One consequence of this for one of the examples used in problem A is that American merchants and companies were able to have a lot of economic control in other regions, and their profits increased as they gained more control of trade in the regions they aimed to control. With economic control of a region, also comes a certain degree of political control, so many US companies used their control to influence political decisions in their favor. For example, the United Fruit Company used their economic control over some portions of South America, and inhibited the development of countries in South America like Guatemala.
History
2 answers:
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

YOU ARE AN ANGEL

Explanation:

THANK YOU SO MUCH

Sergeu [11.5K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Same answer as above

Explanation:

A) One way that trade in some commodities was organized in the late 1800s and early 1900s that gave an economic advantage to merchants and companies in the United States is that the US forcefully made countries nearby and in their control or influence to essentially exclusively trade with the US. The US controlled trade in much of the Western Hemisphere, and used their immense military power to police trade in the region. The phrase, as depicted in the cartoon, “speak softly and carry a big stick”, means that America should negotiate, but also show that they have a lot of military strength, without actually doing anything, unless absolutely necessary.

B) One similar way trade was organized in the same time period to benefit Europe was that European powers used their military strength to pressure other countries into trading with them. This was similar to the big stick policy, but they established colonies and controlled trade through that. European powers also forced Asian countries to establish ports so that they could trade there. The fundamental principles of both the American big stick policy and its European counterpart are the same, as they control trade in the regions they want to trade in with their military strength and influence.

C) One consequence of this for one of the examples used in problem A is that American merchants and companies were able to have a lot of economic control in other regions, and their profits increased as they gained more control of trade in the regions they aimed to control. With economic control of a region, also comes a certain degree of political control, so many US companies used their control to influence political decisions in their favor. For example, the United Fruit Company used their economic control over some portions of South America, and inhibited the development of countries in South America like Guatemala.

You might be interested in
During the post war years, the middle class was
frutty [35]

Answer:

Explanation:In the suburbs, people from different backgrounds created communities. Middle-class Americans looked to national media for advice on matters (from celebrating Thanksgiving to raising Child 101).  

By 1950s, America was becoming middle-class nation. Lines separating working class and middle class seemed less important b/c large # of blue-collar workers participated in suburban middle-class culture. Family's living standard mattered more than what sort of work made it possible. People of color were invisible in the participation. However, many middle-income African Americans, Latinos and Asian-Americans did participate in broad middle-class culture.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the economic boom of the
slamgirl [31]
The answer would be government
3 0
2 years ago
How did Thomas Paine's pamphlet Common Sense convince reluctant Americans to abandon the goal of reconciliation with Britain and
yarga [219]

Answer:

By January 1776, the American colonies were in open rebellion against Britain. Their  soldiers had captured Fort Ticonderoga, besieged Boston, fortified New York City, and  invaded Canada. Yet few dared voice what most knew was true — they were no longer  fighting for their rights as British subjects. They weren’t fighting for self-defense, or  protection of their property, or to force Britain to the negotiating table. They were  fighting for independence. It took a hard jolt to move Americans from professed  loyalty to declared rebellion, and it came in large part from Thomas Paine’s Common  Sense. Not a dumbed-down rant for the masses, as often described, Common Sense is  a masterful piece of argument and rhetoric that proved the power of words.  Thomas Paine was a firebrand, and his most influential essay — Common Sense —  was a fevered no-holds-barred call for independence. He is credited with turning the  tide of public opinion at a crucial juncture, convincing many Americans that war for  independence was the only option to take, and they had to take it now, or else.Thomas  Paine’s Common Sense appeared as a pamphlet for sale in Philadelphia on January 10,  1776, and, as we say today, it went viral. The first printing sold out in two weeks and  over 150,000 copies were sold throughout America and Europe. It is estimated that one  fifth of Americans read the pamphlet or heard it read aloud in public. General  Washington ordered it read to his troops. Within weeks, it seemed, reconciliation with  Britain had gone from an honorable goal to a cowardly betrayal, while independence  became the rallying cry of united Patriots

Explanation: :)

6 0
4 years ago
What was a characteristic of American companies in the 1920’s
arsen [322]

The story of the Nineteen Twenties is in massive half of a story regarding money. Once some slow years at the starting of the last decade, cash started to flow in people's hands. The flow continuing right up till those fateful few days close to 1929, once it suddenly ceased. After the ostensibly endless success of the previous years, the stock exchange crash and therefore the reason was the Great Depression. Ordinary folks were solely following the lead, after all, it was the country's most powerful figures. The centralized govt was currently dominated by people who thought of business the lifeblood of America.

8 0
3 years ago
What role did Britain and France play in the Danish War?
sveticcg [70]
Britain was technically allied with Denmark but couldn't bring itself to get involved in a protracted war with Prussia. Much drama ensued from Britain 'abandoning' their friends the Danes.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the development of aqueducts effect the people living in rome?
    7·2 answers
  • True or false supernovas send out the element of life
    14·1 answer
  • Match each group involved in the Russian Revolution with its description.
    13·2 answers
  • What attracted France and England to the North Atlantic region? A. fishing industry B. Native Americans C. possibility for gold
    13·2 answers
  • 1. Which of the following represented the largest post-World War II effort to bolster the economies of non-Communist
    15·1 answer
  • Satellite is an example of media
    10·1 answer
  • What are some examples of Limited Government in the Constitution
    12·1 answer
  • Siberia, a part of northern Russia, is one of the coldest places on Earth. Despite its frigid climate, over a quarter of the Rus
    15·1 answer
  • Ano ang naunawaan<br>sa mga partidong<br>politikal sa kasalukuyang panahon?plsssss po paki answer​
    5·1 answer
  • Following the French and Indian War (1754-1763)
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!