Answer:
Yes, earning sensitivity will change in the long run
Explanation:
Earnings Sensitivity Analysis helps in determining the impact of an independent variable over a particular dependent variable based on various assumptions. This comparison on its own, measures changes in the long run.
This technique helps managers in determining the change in net interest income in correspondence to wide range of interest rates.
The repricing gap in the long term window will measure of the difference between the dollar value of assets that will reprice and the dollar value of liabilities that will reprice within a specific time period.
A possible implication is potential to receive a new interest rate.
The assets that could explain the positive reprising gap is Accounts payable and investments.
Two examples of Liabilities are: Short term loans and accounts payable.
Answer:
$13,290.89 and $15,734.26
Explanation:
In this question we have to use the Present value function which is shown on the attachment below:
In the first case
Provided that
Future value = $0
Rate of interest = 12% ÷ 12 months = 1%
NPER = 48 months
PMT = $350
The formula is shown below:
= PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the present value is $13,290.89
In the second case
Provided that
Future value = $0
Rate of interest = 12% ÷ 12 months = 1%
NPER = 60 months
PMT = $350
The formula is shown below:
= PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the present value is $15,734.26
You are reviewing your checking account balance of $800 after you've just sent in your rent check of $500. The money that is available for you is $1300.
<h3>
What we can do if we don't have sufficent balance?</h3>
If you had a check that you don't have sufficient funds for that has been run through the bank the bank will usually charge you an overdraft fee.
This means that you have arranged an overdraft loan/agreement with the bank. The bank will go ahead and pay the fund to the person or company you wrote the check to.
You will have a certain amount of time to put the money back into your account and pay the overdraft fee.
Learn more about Checking account, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/9683236
#SPJ1
The PV gain is 0.56 for an arbitrageur.
<u>Explanation</u>:
PV of the strike price is 60e-(12
4/12) = $57.65
PV of dividend is 0.80e-(12
1/12) = $0.79
where 5 < 64 - 57.65 - 0.79
-
The arbitrageur should buy the option and short stock, this above condition is missing in 10.8 condition.
-
The arbitrageur ought to contribute $ 0.79 of this at 12% for one month to deliver a profit of $0.80 in one month and the remaining $ 58.21 is put resources into four months in 12%, without considering the benefit that figures it out.
-
If the stock price declines below $ 60 of every four months, the arbitrageur loses $ 5 spent on the choice however gains on an extremely short position, the arbitrageur shorts when the stock price is in $ 64 and deliver profit with PV of $ 0.79 and closes the short position when the stock price is $ 60 or less because $ 57.65 is the PV of $ 60 the short position generates at least 64-57.65-0.79 = 5.56
The PV gain at least 5.56-5.00
0.56
-
If the stock price is above $60 at option when exercised and arbitrageur buys stock for $60 for four months and closes the short option. The PV of 60 is $57.65 and the dividend is 0.79 and gain in a short position and exercise the short option it results in 64-57.65-0.79= 5.56 and gains on PV is 5.56-5.0 = 0.56
Answer:
b) Dwight is liable for negligence because Stan did not knowingly assume the risk that Dwight would hit a shot in his direction
Explanation:
In this scenario there was an agreement between Stan and Dwight where Dwight asked Stan to drive ahead in the golf cart to see if they could hit their shots.
However Stan drove the cart over the hill, saw the green was clear, and started driving back to the tee box.
Instead of waiting as agreed Dwight made a shot that hit Stan on the head injuring him.
Dwight is liable in this case because he was supposed to wait and get feedback from Stan before making a shot.
He knowingly made the shot knowing there was a blind spot.
This is negligence on Dwight's part.