Two rabbits - subject noun phrase verb phase - nibbled
Answer: the answer would be A, as you want to keep your notes short and to the point, so you’d not want to copy them all directly.
Explanation:
Answer:
<em />
<em>The correct answer is 4) Bob was a good guy. He was the best buddy a guy could have.</em>
Explanation:
- Randy did not want to fight in the new rumble because he knew nothing would bring back Bob.
- In a way, he wanted to honor his best friends death.
- <u>On the other hand, Pony boy wanted to avenge Bob's death and blamed Randy for it.</u>
<u />
- <u>He wanted to teach him a lesson.</u>
- Randy knew everyone was in pain after Bob's death and he thought that this blood-thirsty cycle of fights needs to end.
The answer to your question would be that the version of the sentence that has correctly placed commas is the following one: Noah, who draws comic books in his free time, wants to write a graphic novel. That is, your answer would be option A.
The clause set off with the commas is a non-restrictive relative clause. This means that it provides information which is considered non-essential to the meaning of the sentence and therefore can be dropped without altering its meaning. That is why they are set off with commas, parentheses or dashes.
Answer:
Glaucon seemed to think the answer was no. But Paul Feldman sides with Socrates and Adam Smith—for he knows the answer, at least 87 percent of the time, is yes.
Explanation:
Compared with Feldman's argument, the tale of "The Ring of Gyges" is best described as a counterclaim to the idea that most people are moral. The tale is about the corruption of a man, Gyges, that found a ring that made him invisible. One he had that power he saw no reason to follow society's morals and did whatever he wanted to. One could argue that the reason that many people have to "behave" or to act according to the law and morals of a society is the look of others. The judgment that one would encounter should he not follow a certain rule, even if they are "little" things.
