1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
loris [4]
3 years ago
5

What did the Colonization Law of 1823 do for Stephen Austin?

History
2 answers:
nadya68 [22]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

it both C and B

hope it helps

Hoochie [10]3 years ago
5 0
B I believe it allowed him to buy land in Texas for $1.25 per acre
You might be interested in
Why westward expansion create more conflict between the north and south
Eva8 [605]

In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans, and it doubled the size of the United States. To Jefferson, westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health: He believed that a republic depended on an independent, virtuous citizenry for its survival, and that independence and virtue went hand in hand with land ownership, especially the ownership of small farms. (“Those who labor in the earth,” he wrote, “are the chosen people of God.”) In order to provide enough land to sustain this ideal population of virtuous yeomen, the United States would have to continue to expand. The westward expansion of the United States is one of the defining themes of 19th-century American history, but it is not just the story of Jefferson’s expanding “empire of liberty.” On the contrary, as one historian writes, in the six decades after the Louisiana Purchase, westward expansion “very nearly destroy[ed] the republic.”

Manifest Destiny

By 1840, nearly 7 million Americans–40 percent of the nation’s population–lived in the trans-Appalachian West. Following a trail blazed by Lewis and Clark, most of these people had left their homes in the East in search of economic opportunity. Like Thomas Jefferson, many of these pioneers associated westward migration, land ownership and farming with freedom. In Europe, large numbers of factory workers formed a dependent and seemingly permanent working class; by contrast, in the United States, the western frontier offered the possibility of independence and upward mobility for all. In 1843, one thousand pioneers took to the Oregon Trail as part of the “Great Emigration.”

Did you know? In 1853, the Gadsden Purchase added about 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory to the United States and fixed the boundaries of the “lower 48” where they are today.

In 1845, a journalist named John O’Sullivan put a name to the idea that helped pull many pioneers toward the western frontier. Westward migration was an essential part of the republican project, he argued, and it was Americans’ “manifest destiny” to carry the “great experiment of liberty” to the edge of the continent: to “overspread and to possess the whole of the [land] which Providence has given us,” O’Sullivan wrote. The survival of American freedom depended on it.

Westward Expansion and Slavery

Meanwhile, the question of whether or not slavery would be allowed in the new western states shadowed every conversation about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had attempted to resolve this question: It had admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. More important, it had stipulated that in the future, slavery would be prohibited north of the southern boundary of Missouri (the 36º30’ parallel) in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase.

However, the Missouri Compromise did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. The Southern economy grew increasingly dependent on “King Cotton” and the system of forced labor that sustained it. Meanwhile, more and more Northerners came to believed that the expansion of slavery impinged upon their own liberty, both as citizens–the pro-slavery majority in Congress did not seem to represent their interests–and as yeoman farmers. They did not necessarily object to slavery itself, but they resented the way its expansion seemed to interfere with their own economic opportunity.

Westward Expansion and the Mexican War

Despite this sectional conflict, Americans kept on migrating West in the years after the Missouri Compromise was adopted. Thousands of people crossed the Rockies to the Oregon Territory, which belonged to Great Britain, and thousands more moved into the Mexican territories of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, American settlers in Texas joined with their Tejano neighbors (Texans of Spanish origin) and won independence from Mexico. They petitioned to join the United States as a slave state.

3 0
3 years ago
From what country did most
Firlakuza [10]

Answer: Well, according the the all-knowing Googs:

"Immigration to the U.S. in the Late 1800s. Between 1870 and 1900, the largest number of immigrants continued to come from northern and western Europe including Great Britain, Ireland, and Scandinavia. But "new" immigrants from southern and eastern Europe were becoming one of the most important forces in American life."

However!! Uh, There is no 'however', but I hope this lazily-obtained answer helps you, and if it does not, then comment and I will scour the internet for the answer in which. you. seek.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the sinking of theLouisiana 1915 affect World War I
o-na [289]

Lusitania was an important event in World War I. The death of so many innocent civilians at the hands of the Germans galvanized American support for entering the war, which eventually turned the tide in favor of the Allies. The Lusitania was a British luxury cruise ship.


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you were to run a country which economic system would you pick and why ?
Tresset [83]

Answer:

This is an opinion piece, here are your options.

Explanation:

Capitalism - Free market, individuals own the means of production. Survival of the fittest and most fortunate. Individualistic society.

Socialism - The means of production are owned by the collective, rather than individual CEOs. Few private enterprises.

Communism - The government owns the means of production. No private businesses. Collective society.

6 0
3 years ago
Since the creation of Israel in 1948 A) the nations of the Middle East have worked together peacefully. B) there have been ongoi
svp [43]
The answer is B. There have been ongoing conflicts between Israel and the Arab world. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was the Mayflower Compact important to the success of the Plymouth colony?
    8·1 answer
  • The seasons of liturgical year
    6·1 answer
  • What is the term for a formal agreement between the US and foreign nations as described in the Constitution? A) Agreement B) Con
    8·1 answer
  • In this picture, Franklin Roosevelt is seated
    10·1 answer
  • Why did General MacArthur address Congress after he was fired?
    6·1 answer
  • Organized Indian resistance to American control ended in 1890 after the battle at __________. Wounded Knee Creek Little Bighorn
    7·1 answer
  • I AM GIVING BRAINLIEST! PLEASEEEEEE HELPPPP I NEEDDD HELPPPPP
    13·1 answer
  • In what ways did<br> the economics of the American Revolution lead<br> to Shays's Rebellion?
    13·1 answer
  • Columbus would receive all of the following rewards for his discovery except:
    7·2 answers
  • What was a major similarity between Charlemagne and William the Conqueror regarding their kingdoms?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!