President Truman's reasoning behind bombing the cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was to ultimately end the devasting war. He wanted to put an end to the agony that it had cause.
I do not agree with the decision to drop an atomic bomb on two (very populated) cities, however, it was not my decision to make, and was far before my time.
The atomic bombs "Little Boy" and "Fat Man" resulted in approximately 105,000 fatalities, and 95,000 causalities.
There were four other alternatives to dropping the atomic bombs:
- Offer the Japanese conditional surrender by lifting some of the terms
- Wait for the Soviets to attack Mancharia and Korea (which were occupies by the Japanese)
- Naval blockade
- Invade the Japanese "home" islands
Unconditional surrender was <u>discussed</u> during the Casablanca Conference in 1943, and the US <u>demanded</u> for unconditional surrender in the Potsdam Declaration in 1945.
A) North
concluding my research I have found out that the north had better weapons then the south.
The correct answer should be Save those notes for use on another topic
You shouldn't change your entire thesis or your notes to fit it because that would be bad for the thesis and for the notes. Discarding them completely would be a waste of the notes so it's better to put them away for future use since you never know when you might need them.
Answer:
Diplomacy
Explanation:
Why u ask?! well you see USA had missiles in Turkey and Soviet Union Saw this as a threat so they put missiles in Cuba, Kennedy the President at the time knew that This would be a disaster and asked Russia to remove the nukes and Russia declined then asked USA to remove thier nukes from Turkey they also declined and after a series of boring stuff happening they bother decided to remove the nukes before the world ends :)
