Answer: B) The general rules the prescribe proper behavior.
Explanation:
A moral rule is an opinion that’s inspired by a wish to be good. Moral values, often molded after the surrounding context and belief system, define people´s notion of what´s right or wrong. Not to be confuseed with ethics. Morals refer mostly to general principles, whereas ethics point to specific rules or behaviors. An ethical principle is not neceseraly moral, but a set of rules to be followed.
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
Since most of this has taken place from the Jim Crow era on forth wich was an era of segregation and racism than most likely it would be any race that wasn’t classified “American”
According to the study of the anthropologist David, it can be inferred that US military bases and military actions are ineffective ways of solving international problems (option A)
Since its formation, the United States has been a very influential country worldwide. Today it is one of the world's economic powers and its influence on other countries transcends all kinds of issues.
After World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union shared the label of being world powers. This unleashed competition in all aspects to prevail globally over its rival. Due to the above, the US intervention in other countries intensified as in the case of:
- Vietnam
- South Korea
- Europe
- South America
- Middle East
These interventions have been aimed at solving different problems in the countries. However, the result has been adverse because this only intensifies the problem of violence, violating the self-determination of the people.
According to the above, the most correct conclusion reached by the anthropologist David is that the intervention of the United States has not contributed significantly to the improvement of the problems in other countries.
Note: This question is incomplete because the options are missing. Here are the options:
- A. U.S. military bases and military actions are ineffective ways of solving international problems.
- B. U.S. military bases are effective in benefiting indigenous peoples.
- C. U.S. military bases are effective in benefiting U.S. citizens.
- D. U.S. military bases create more jobs for U.S. citizens than would funding education and health-care industries within the United States.
Learn more about anthropology in: brainly.com/question/8116175
