<u>It helps the writers visualize the inside of a black hole. </u>
<em>The other options can described bluntly and scientifically with just names and numbers. </em>
If the writer were to use more formal writing to describe things so abstract like a black hole, it would be hard for the common reader to understand.
____________________________
for example,
The black hole looks like a giant vacuum of nothingness (informal)
The black hole is like a mass whose Schwarzchild radius is outside of itself (formal)
Which is easier to understand? Most likely the first one because of the use of informal language and writing.
Hope I helped!
The correct answer is <span>what is written in the Constitution is not open to interpretation
Strict constructionism is a way of interpreting the constitution. Constructionists only accept what is written and the way in which it was written. There is nothing beyond what is written and from his point of view, if it says that all people are equal and citizens of the United States then all people indeed, including African-Americans. For him, there is no interpretation that looks at deeper meaning, what is written is what is intended and that's why he is a strict constructionist. </span>
Ma’am or sir just write what you did and felt as a 8th grader lol. btw im in 8th too lol
The stressed syllables forming an iambic pentameter in the line from "Romeo and Juliet" are "house, both, like- dig-, -ty." (options C)
<h3>What is iambic pentameter?</h3>
An iamb is a sequence consisting of an unstressed syllable followed by a stressed one. An iambic pentameter is formed by repeating that sequence 5 times.
Let's highlight the stressed syllables in the line from "Romeo and Juliet" too better illustrate the use of iambic pentameter by Shakespeare: "Two households both alike in dignity."
Learn more about iambic pentameter here:
brainly.com/question/2879975
