Answer:
The following conversation is acceptable.
Explanation:
Squilliam- "Hello James, It has been a while"
James- "Hello Squilliam, nice to see you recovered from that horrible incident"
Squilliam- "yes, it is isn't it"
James- "I like the outfit, but this is isn't a fancy dress party"
Squilliam- "Oh it isn't? Then why did you come dressed like a home less man?"
James- "Very funny Squilliam, any marriages you want to ruin again? or was that just for last year?"
Squilliam- "I don't know James, any houses you want to burn down? Or was mine enough for you?"
Explanation:
Within that address, Barack Obama is concentrating on two main issues;
- Reduction of the national debt as well as an emphasis on expenditure, especially on schooling. Obama claims that planning for the future of schooling would hold the running smoothly in the years.
- Government expenditure must be recognised by people since it impacts their everyday life, from taxation deducted from their pay packets to both the social welfare of all residents.
Answer:
•The relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.
Explanation:
Without transitions the argument will be unorganized. The reader will need to know how to follow along in a argument.
<3
