I believe the answer to this question would be a??
<span>The correct answer here is chronological order.
There are numerous ways of organizing your speech and chronological is one of them and for presentation on a person, Ronald Reagen in this example, is a good choice. The chronological structure follows events as they have happened. So a story from a childhood to death is a an good example of a chronological structure. </span>
Based on the fact that Bob is in the apart 30% of the time but when Bill is there, Bob is there 10% of the time, Bill and Bob are not independent in terms of being in the apartment.
<h3>How to know independent events?</h3>
- When occurrences are independent, the likelihood of one occurring has no bearing on the likelihood of the other occurring. It implies that regardless of whether one event occurs, the probability of the other stay unchanged.
- The odds of independent event A and independent event B are as follows:
- P(A | B) = P(A) and P(B | A) = P(B)
- For Bob and Bill to be independent, there should be an equal chance that Bob will be in the apartment whether Bill is there or not.
- Bob and Bill are not independent when it comes to living in the apartment because Bob is there less when Bill is there.
To learn more about independent events, refer
brainly.com/question/28786451
#SPJ4
The Constitution leaves a lot of space for personal interpretation, which means different people can view the document in different ways and to different degrees. For example, one may say, something that isn't stated in the Constitution means the government shouldn't do it. This is called strict interpretation of the Constitution. However, someone else may say that there wasn't anything in the Constitution prohibiting it. These differences have played a role in the formation of political parties. Hope this helps! :)