1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kobusy [5.1K]
2 years ago
5

Which is better virtual school or face to face school? please put an explanation!

English
1 answer:
Yuki888 [10]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

I would say I'm qualified to answer as I've done both.

It's very dependant on the person. Some people go to virtual school because of limitations like mental illness.

Virtual school is slightly more flexible in terms of due dates and deadlines, and can be acessed anywhere or at any time of day. There are more electives and clubs, and plenty of college resources.

The downside of Virtual school is that it can be very isolating. You don't leave the house or see people in person, and that can be depressing. Because you don't leave the house for school there can be a weird sense of monotony. There is no division between home and school, and that really sucks.

__________________________________________________________

The benefits of face to face schools have to do more with social interaction.  You can exchange smiles with people and build friendships. You are developing people skills there. You learn how to work with people, and how to deal with negativity and sucky people.

There is the obvious downside of bullying, which is often the reason people leave face to face school. You can't really reach your teachers after hours, which can be limiting in terms of getting assignment help. There is the cursed science fair, and in person PE classes, and locker rooms and the like.

You might be interested in
Does the following passage contain a fragment? The dinner was really good. Because the vegetables were fresh, they were especial
dsp73
Yes there are fragments in that sentence
8 0
2 years ago
Please help me with this question. Please
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

even-handedness or impartiality

6 0
2 years ago
3) How has Katniss been adopted by political parties in the United States?
vlada-n [284]

AJennifer Lawrence in Hunger Games: Catching Fire

'Sure Katniss Everdeen is an idealised fantasy anti-authoriatarian heroine … What she isn’t is either 'girly' or interested in riches.' Photograph: Allstar/Lionsgate/Sportsphoto Ltd

All hail Katniss Everdeen of The Hunger Games trilogy. If you are the mother of a pre-teen girl, you will know the whispered relief around these films. "About time. Go!" If you would like your teenage daughter to see something other than the underclass sobbing on a crass talent show, orange twentysomethings Botoxing themselves, or girls who are just "naturally thin" and who giggle when their clothes just drop off, then you will already know about them. If, like me, you simply would like to see a young woman not defined by her relationship to men, crack open the pick 'n' mix.

Clearly I am not alone. Nor is my youngest. Catching Fire, the sequel to The Hunger Games, has had the fourth biggest box office weekend opening in history. Ever since the first film came out, my daughter read the books by Suzanne Collins and we have a shrine to Peeta, Katniss's fellow contestant.

Advertisement

The books are neither warm nor easy, but then dystopian futures of totalitarian states (Panem, as it is called) only work when they're not so far from the imagination. In The Hunger Games, the rich and powerful control the Capitol and dress in grotesque Gaga-ish costumes while the poor live out in the Districts and are treated with increasing contempt.

This is a police state where "peacekeepers" kill and torture. Hegemony is maintained by giving them very little – that's why Katniss learned to hunt illegally – but staging huge spectacles: each District is "reaped" to find two people who are chosen for the televised Hunger Games.

So this is a satire on the kind of TV that its target audience watches. The games are a brutal contest to kill every other contestant. It is the logical conclusion of reality TV: survival of the fittest. At the centre of this is Katniss, played by the sparky Jennifer Lawrence, who is seen on red carpets in apparently awful outfits. What do I know? Every time I read these gown-downs, as I call them, I like the ones the fashionistas hate (Bjork wearing a swan being my all-time favourite). We have seen Lawrence being chatted up on camera by sleazoid Jack Nicholson, who, to be fair, is only three times her age. And we have seen her lose it in front of the paparazzi, screaming: "Stop. Stop. Stop." So she isn't just acting cool, she is cool and aware that she wants to keep her body healthy-looking, not a size zero.

Sign up to our Film Today email

Read more

The obligation to be a role model is daunting and modern. I can't remember wanting to be anyone other than Mr Spock and David Bowie. The female bit is blank – my memory is only full of girls I did not want to be or never imagined I could be.

Since then, we pretty much have a roll-call of politically correct heroines, but still have to go some way back to find tough, independent women, from Linda Hamilton in Terminator to Sigourney Weaver in Alien, or Tarantino's fantasy of Uma Thurman in Kill Bill. Japanese cinema has produced some magnificent female characters, and, of course, we rewrite the "final girl" of the horror genre: in which, after several women have been raped/killed/tortured, the final girl turns the table and survives.

Lately though, for teenage girls, we have had Twilight's mopey and passive Bella Swan. Buffy the Vampire Slayer is long gone, so to see Katniss (more akin to Neo in The Matrix) as resilient and smart and reluctantly becoming a symbol of a revolution is quite something. Guys fall in love with her but she really has better things to do: the uprising. Unlike Russell Brand's fluffier talk of revolution, the movies do not shy away from the violence and executions that accompany the suppression of dissent, with the great Donald Sutherland's watery eyes conveying pure evil as the president.

Sure, Katniss is an idealised fantasy anti-authoriatarian heroine. She is also confused, stubborn and vulnerable. What she isn't is either "girly" or interested in riches. She makes her bow and arrows to bring down the system. Nothing is said about gender. She is taller than one of her partners and it's her physical and mental prowess that we root for.

i hope it will help you

please mark as brainliest

and rate it

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Please help me!! ill give brainliest and a thanks ^^
Yanka [14]

Answer:

I think it is B Hope it help You

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read the excerpt from act II of William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. Which lines convey the reason Friar Laurence is willing
ira [324]
Come  young waverer come go with me in one respect i'll thy assistant
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are the Nuremberg racial laws
    10·2 answers
  • Guuysss check my answer pweeaaseee
    13·1 answer
  • Questions 1–9: For each sentence, select the verb. Then, indicate whether it’s an action, linking, or helping verb.
    13·1 answer
  • What can a food web diagram be used to show?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the function of this sentence? Jesse ran over fifty miles to save the rain forest.
    12·2 answers
  • Which statement uses the word snake in a positive and figurative way?
    13·2 answers
  • Rewrite each item using verb and tense in parenthesis<br> we (do-future perfect)
    7·2 answers
  • What attracts Daisy to Gatsby?
    15·2 answers
  • True of false: ALL short changes are caused by humans.<br><br> ( True<br> ( False
    14·2 answers
  • Please write 4-5 sentences about what you see in this image.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!