Answer:
B) Boaz admires Ruth’s courage in coming to a land that is foreign to her.
C) Boaz respects Ruth’s character due to the sacrifices she has made to be loyal to Naomi.
Explanation:
Ruth was the daughter-in-law of a woman named Naomi whose sons had died leaving her with the two widowed wives, Ruth and Orpah. Naomi's husband Elimelek had also died so she decided to return back to her hometown of Bethlehem. But she also gave permission to the two widows to return to their own families and stay happy with them.
While Orpah left, Ruth sticks with her mother-in-law and went to Bethlehem. There, she did work, obeying whatever Naomi told her or asked her to go, collecting the leftover harvests in people's fields. In one such field, the owner Boaz came to know about her. It is after much observation that he spoke to her these given words in the passage from <u>chapter 2:11</u>. This passage reveals the <u>admiration that Boaz has for Ruth, her courage in coming to a foreign land away from her own family. It also reveals the respect that Boaz has for Ruth's character for the sacrifices she has made by being loyal to her mother-in-law Naomi.</u>
The answer is A - The minister’s sermon was very short and interesting.
You can use the words singling out
Answer:
The author's main argument in his essay was to tell how to develop scientific claims reaching to it's final conclusion rather than fascinating claims.
Explanation:
'Sex, Drugs, Disasters, and the Extinction of Dinosaurs' is an essay written by Stephen Jay Gould, a Professor of Geology at Harvard University.
In his essay he explains how dinosaurs extinction took place by elaborating the three elements– sex, drugs, and disaster. By detailing each and every aspects, Gould presents how a good scientific proposal is elaborated. He starts his essay by defining science and how conclusions are reached through series of consequences and not by fascination. Then he goes on the explain his points and reaching the conclusion of his thesis.
Therefore, the main argument by Gould in this essay was to educate his readers how to develop scientific claims reaching to it's final conclusion rather than fascinating claims.
