22,000 were killed or injured. It was a result of "carelessness" on the part of the workers (as said in coursehero.com)
Answer:
economy.
Explanation:
In 133 BC, the turmoil within Rome's economy proved dangerous for the Republic's stability.
With the growing economy of Rome, the gap between the rich and poor of Rome grew. With this growing gap, grew tension and turmoil within Rome. At that time stood two brothers, Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, to stand for poor farmers of Rome, but were killed. This growing tension in the economy provoked slave revolts and military precipitation in Rome which resulted in the Fall of the Republic.
Answer:
Explanation:
Massacre: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.
“an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people” Many is of course “A large quantity”. So there we have it, certainly more than a couple but if it gets to be say 100,000, which is definitely a large number, I suspect that might be encroaching into the realms of genocide.
OK so if you happen upon a car crash and there are bodies spread over the scene, 2 from each of the 2 cars, then you would immediately spot, just by looking there were 4 people involved, but if it was a pair of coaches each with 52 passengers and they were all spread around the scene you wouldn’t be able to put a number to it by just sweeping your eyes across the mess, perhaps then it is getting to be a massacre. Could that be a useful definition? If the number slaughtered is more than you can estimate merely with a look? I also think it needs to be within a definable area, like a football field, or a stadium or perhaps a town. If it involved a whole region of a country then it becomes Genocide, maybe.
Could it be then The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of more people within a definable area than you can estimate readily with a sweep of your eyes.
Just a suggestion, so go gently on me ………….
Now gimme them i need them
Answer:
Explanation: The Platt Amendment was an amendment made in 1901 to a resolution of the United States Congress. It said that all treaties with Cuba had to be approved by the U.S. Senate and the U.S. had the right to interfere in Cuba's affairs if order broke down within Cuba.
