Hello. This question is imcomplet. The full question is:
Read the excerpt from "Healthy Eating." She can also scan food to determine whether she's met her daily need. "So after I have breakfast and lunch, and if I've had too many carbs, by dinner I know I have to cut back," she said. And that kind of tailoring is key, nutritionists say. "People want me to just tell them what to eat, give them a meal plan. But they'll only follow it for two weeks," [dietician] Castro-Romero said. "So I get them to focus on the foods they're eating now and improve. One group might be soda drinkers. So we work to decrease rather than eliminate. "It's really trying to keep it simple and look at small changes. I like to say small changes produce big results."
Why does Castro-Romero not want to give her clients completely new meal plans to follow?
Answer:
Because he believes that it is more efficient to justify the meal plan that customers already have than to form a completely new one.
Explanation:
As can be seen in the text above Castro-Romero believes that completely and drastically changing the way customers reach themselves is not an efficient option. For him, very drastic changes cause the abandonment of the diet, making it more recommended to make small changes in the food that customers already have and to intensify these changes over time.
The question above is one of about the psychology of trust.
According to psychologists, people who find it hard to trust others usually themselves can't be trusted.
Some of the signs that a person has trust issues are:
- they make people seem like they are capable of exhibiting the very action that they are capable of: This entails accusing others of behaviors that they themselves are exhibiting or thinking of carrying out;
- They breach confidentiality: It is easy to see from the comment that the person speaking is most likely prone to breach confidentiality. If a person has refused to help another, the question is, how is that related to whether or not they are trustworthy?
So a person who is more likely to say that you can't trust another person may themselves be unworthy of trust.
Read more about Trust here:
brainly.com/question/6014670
Answer:
The purpose is to highlight the importance of what he is going to say.
Explanation:
When the author uses repetition to say "… let us be very clear, and make very clear to all the world what our motives and our objects are," he is drawing the attention of listeners and readers and highlighting the importance of what he is going to speak. This makes the public pay close attention to his words, as these words will have a strong impact and must be very well understood and kept, as they present something essential and important.
The suffix -ible is like the suffix -able. They both mean "capable of doing."
Example:
Convertible means being able or capable of converting.
