Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
Answer:
President Reagan signed a legislation on October 31, 1986, eliminating the age 70 cap on the group of workers protected by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"). ... Another consequence of the law is to make it unlawful for most employers to mandatorily retire employees of any age.
Explanation:
Explanation:
Generally, if you are just summarizing a single article and you have provided the name of the author and title of the article in the first sentence, you do not need to add any additional citations. However, be sure to follow your instructor's directions.
Answer:
Swahili and Kilwa
Explanation:
East Africa coasts played an influential role in promoting trade with Asia through the Indian Ocean to places like India, Southeast Asia, and China. As trade increase between Africa and Asia, city-states flourished and prospered along the eastern coast of Africa. These included Kilwa, Mombasa, Malindi, Sofala, and others.
Trade increased in East Africa because of gold and ivory. Muslim traders from Arabia brought luxury goods in Africa.
Many merchants from Arabia and Asia stayed in the city-states of East Africa, which led to a new and different ethnic group known as the Swahili. Swahili, steadily grew and prospered, and become economic power by the 1400s.
