Answer:
a) 12.87%
b) 11.03%
Explanation:
EBIT with no debt = $111,000
net income = $111,000 x (1 - 22%) = $86,580
total value of the firm with no debt = $86,580 / 12% = $721,500
value of the firm after debt is taken = $721,500 + ($165,000 x 22%) = $757,800
debt to equity ratio after debt is taken = $165,000 / ($757,800 - $165,000) = 27.834%
new cost of equity (Re) = 12% + [(12% - 8%) x 27.834% x (1 - 22%)] = 12.87%
WACC = (0.72166 x 12.87%) + (0.27834 x 8% x 0.78) = 9.288% + 1.737% = 11.025$ = 11.03%
Answer:<em> Option (b) and (d) are untrue.</em>
Explanation:
From the given option, the following statement about aims and objectives are untrue<em>:</em><em> An objective describes what the learners will be able to do with the language by the end of the lesson, You could have one overall aim and some secondary aims.</em>
<em>Aim is in regards with what you hope to do, your comprehensive purpose in project. It will gesticulate what/where you aspire to be at the end of the project. An aim is usually wide. It is earnest, but not beyond the bounds of possibility. </em>
<em>Whereas;
</em>
<em>There are more than one objective, these can be referred to as the specific steps taken to achieve our aim. </em>
Answer:
A conglomerate is a business combination merging more than three businesses that make unrelated products.
Explanation:
A conglomerate is a group of companies with different activities. This business concept spread to Europe from the United States after World War II. The benefits were considered to increase the company's long-term profitability by spreading risk to various business areas.
However, conglomeration often led to an increase in administrative costs. Furthermore, the conglomerate's management rarely had the competence to handle a number of companies in different industries. The conglomerates that were listed on the stock exchange were regularly valued lower than the total market value of the subsidiaries, indicating that the stock market did not believe in the very idea of creating such corporate groups. The risk diversification that the conglomerate was aiming for could equally well be achieved by the individual investor in his own equity portfolio. Therefore, since the 1970s, many conglomerates have split up, and most companies have instead focused on creating competitive advantages through their core business.
There are a number of factors that changes the value of the dollar; whether in favor or not.
- The country's monetary policies
- Demand for dollar
- International trade
- Economic growth
- Inflation
<h3>What causes a change in dollars value?</h3>
The value of dollars appreciate or depreciate when;
The demand for dollar is high or low. For example, the global community usually want their investment secured with a stable currency. Some of them prefer their investments in dollars. This means that the demand for dollars increases and also it value appreciates. If people don't demand for dollars, and the country has little investors, the dollar depreciates.
Learn more about value of dollars here;
brainly.com/question/4536858
#SPJ1
Answer:
E
Explanation:
All of these choices are correct.
Place refers to the channels of distribution either through distribution/market channels and physical distribution. It is a vital part of the total marketing mix, it ensures that products are available to the appropriate markets, at the right proportion or quantity, at the best condition, appropriate time, anytime and at all times.
