Answer:
Total PV= $2,736.39
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Year Cash Flow
1 $ 870
2 950
3 0
4 1,540
<u>First, we need to calculate the real annual discount rate:</u>
Quarterly Discount rate= 0.08/4= 0.02
Real annual interest rate= [(1+i)^n] - 1
Real annual interest rate= [(1.02^4) - 1]
Real annual interest rate= 0.08243
<em><u>Now, we can calculate the present value of the cash flows:</u></em>
PV= Cf/(1+i)^n
Year 1= 870/1.08243= 803.75
Year 2= 950/1.08243^2= 810.82
Year 4= 1,540/1.08243^4= 1,121.82
Total PV= $2,736.39
Answer:
Price variance will be $4512.5 ( Unfavorable )
Explanation:
We have given standard material cost per yard = $2
Actual material cost per yard = $2.10
Standard yards per unit = 4.5
And actual yards per unit = 4.75
Units of production = 9500
Total number of actual quantity used = 9500×4.75 = 45125
So direct material price variance = ( standard price - actual price ) × actual quantity used = ( $2 - $2.1 ) × 45125 = -$4512.5
So price variance will be $4512.5 ( Unfavorable )
Answer:
$1,839.45
Explanation:
PV = P * [1-(1+r)^-n / r]
n = 30*12=360 months, r = 6.37%/12 = 0.5308% (monthly)
295,000 = P*[1 - (1+0.005308)^-360 / 0.005308}
295,000 = P * $160.3739
P = $295,000 / $160.3739
P = $1,839.45
So, the monthly mortgage payments is $1,839.45.
Answer:
B. The portfolio should be reallocated based on their stated investment objective, reducing the cash and bond percentage by 50% and using the proceeds to buy a small or mid-cap growth mutual fund
Explanation:
Since this couple has stated investment goal of development with moderate hazard, a portfolio that just has about 25% values and that has 75% fixed pay protections is improper - since it will give pay; yet little development. The long haul bond and money designation ought to be decreased and supplanted with development stocks to more readily adjust the portfolio. Decision C is unreasonably theoretical for a "preservationist financial specialist." Choice D is to some degree valid since this couple is putting resources into their manager's stock - yet since the stock just speaks to 8% of the client's all out portfolio, this isn't a too much enormous rate.