1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VikaD [51]
2 years ago
5

Read the passages and identify which supports a Federalist position and which supports an Anti-Federalist position. Explain your

reasoning.
Passage 1:
I have, in the course of my observation on this constitution, affirmed and endeavored to [show], that it was calculated to abolish entirely the state governments, and to melt down the states into one entire government, for every purpose as well internal and local, as external and national.
Passage 2:
The proposed Constitution, so far from implying an abolition of the State governments, makes them constituent parts of the national sovereignty, by allowing them a direct representation in the Senate, and leaves in their possession certain exclusive and very important portions of sovereign power. This fully corresponds, in every rational import of the terms, with the idea of a federal government.
Scoring:
ï‚· Students should identify the first passage as expressing an Anti-Federalist position because it opposes the Constitution. It claims that the document will abolish the state governments.
ï‚· Students should identify the second passage as expressing a Federalist position because it supports the Constitution. It states that the document leaves a great deal of power to the states by giving them a major rolein the Senate.
2. Why did the framers of the U.S. Constitution include restrictions on federal power? Identify the constitutional principle these restrictions reflect and describe at least one restriction in detail.
Social Studies
1 answer:
iren [92.7K]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Passage number 1 is anti-federalist, while passage number 2 is federalist.

The constitution's authors included restrictions on federal power to prevent the president from abusing power, or from having full power as a king.

Explanation:

Federalism defended the integration of the power of the states into a central power, the federal power, which would work together with the states in the management of national policy. The federal government did not intend to concentrate the entire power on the president, but to allow a series of governmental divisions that would prevent the centralization of power, but distribute it in a fair and beneficial way to the people.

You might be interested in
In the text "Freedom of the Press" does the author think high school students should all have Freedom of the Press?​
crimeas [40]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
The legal voting age in Canada is<br> A 16<br> B. 18<br> C 21<br> D. 25
kherson [118]

Answer:

B. 18 is your correct answer.

Can I get Brainliest? Thx Peace...

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did George Mason suggest must be included in the new Constitution?
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

The bill of rights

Explanation:

In 1787, toward the end of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Mason proposed that a bill of rights preface the Constitution, but his proposal was defeated. ... At the first session of the first Congress, Madison introduced a Bill of Rights that paralleled Mason's Declaration of Rights of 1776.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements best explains why producers conduct
almond37 [142]

Answer:

D. Knowing what consumers want helps producers make more

money

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sam has worked for the company for 30 years and is very good, although slow at his job of putting together reports on the depart
jeyben [28]

Answer:

The correct answer is Dispositional resistance

Explanation:

Dispositional resistance can be described in psychological terms as a tendency to avoid to resist or avoid changes in general, wheter is a behaviour or something external to the individual who tends to devalue change and finds it unnecesary or counterproductive. In Sam's case we can see that it's clearly a case of Dispositional resistence because he has worked for the company for 30 years, and he finds the change proposed by Susan as unnecesary and he is reluctant to the whole idea of changing his work methods, therefore we can clearly see what is described above and evidence a Dispositional resistance.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLZZ HELPP MEE
    10·1 answer
  • Who were the major superpowers in the cold war?
    15·1 answer
  • How do scientists date fossils and artifacts.?
    8·1 answer
  • The idea of separation of powers was considered important to prolong democracy. How was it supposed to help?
    10·1 answer
  • Why don’t people vote for third parties?
    5·1 answer
  • Suppose you have made a decision or taken an action based on a source you discover is not credible. Describe the consequences th
    11·1 answer
  • Why were treaties so important to the us?
    8·1 answer
  • Gandhi believed that non-violence was important to proving his
    6·2 answers
  • So I had a C in one of my classes and yesterday I took a test.
    7·2 answers
  • What is the proper title for the county official who is responsible for collecting county and state taxes and fees?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!