1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VikaD [51]
2 years ago
5

Read the passages and identify which supports a Federalist position and which supports an Anti-Federalist position. Explain your

reasoning.
Passage 1:
I have, in the course of my observation on this constitution, affirmed and endeavored to [show], that it was calculated to abolish entirely the state governments, and to melt down the states into one entire government, for every purpose as well internal and local, as external and national.
Passage 2:
The proposed Constitution, so far from implying an abolition of the State governments, makes them constituent parts of the national sovereignty, by allowing them a direct representation in the Senate, and leaves in their possession certain exclusive and very important portions of sovereign power. This fully corresponds, in every rational import of the terms, with the idea of a federal government.
Scoring:
ï‚· Students should identify the first passage as expressing an Anti-Federalist position because it opposes the Constitution. It claims that the document will abolish the state governments.
ï‚· Students should identify the second passage as expressing a Federalist position because it supports the Constitution. It states that the document leaves a great deal of power to the states by giving them a major rolein the Senate.
2. Why did the framers of the U.S. Constitution include restrictions on federal power? Identify the constitutional principle these restrictions reflect and describe at least one restriction in detail.
Social Studies
1 answer:
iren [92.7K]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Passage number 1 is anti-federalist, while passage number 2 is federalist.

The constitution's authors included restrictions on federal power to prevent the president from abusing power, or from having full power as a king.

Explanation:

Federalism defended the integration of the power of the states into a central power, the federal power, which would work together with the states in the management of national policy. The federal government did not intend to concentrate the entire power on the president, but to allow a series of governmental divisions that would prevent the centralization of power, but distribute it in a fair and beneficial way to the people.

You might be interested in
The part of the US government that interprets laws is the
garri49 [273]
I think the answer is the judicial branch, they determine if the laws are constitutional or not
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What branch of<br> government controls<br> the federal courts?
ikadub [295]
<h3>Answer:</h3>

The Judicial Branch

<h3>Explanation:</h3>

The judicial branch decides the constitutionality of federal laws and resolves other disputes about federal laws. However, judges depend on our government’s executive branch to enforce court decisions. Courts decide what really happened and what should be done about it.

4 0
3 years ago
What limits do anthropological studies of modern societies have as historical sources ?
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer and Explanation

Anthropology is the study of humans and human behavior and societies in the past and present Social anthropology and cultural anthropology study the norms and values of societies. Linguistic anthropology studies how language affects social life.. The limitations of the anthropological studies of modern societies  are that The total cultural system in any specific case is governed by certain underlying  assumptions, orientations, or controlling mental patterns and The custom-patterns of any culture are learned, which means that they can  also be unlearned or otherwise changed back and be  as usual.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following techniques would a corporate lobbyist be likely to use to influence political outcomes in Congress?. I. O
weqwewe [10]

Answer:

II. Ensuring that the corporation's political action committee (PAC) makes donations to the campaigns of members of key committees

III.Meeting informally with Senate aides over lunch or cocktails

IV.Bringing influential constituents to Washington to discuss important policy matters with their representatives

8 0
3 years ago
Brenda and Jonathan have been married for 15 years. When Brenda develops a potentially fatal lung disease, Jonathan retires in o
Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer:

a) commitment.

Explanation:

This shows that Brenda and Jonathan's relationship has a high level of <em>commitment</em>. In Robert J. Sternberg's triangular theory of love, commitment is the decision to stay in the relationship to achieve common goals and to remain in the relationship even when facing problems. As Brenda and Jonathan have a long-term commitment Jonathan's commitment to caring for Brenda is shown by his retaring to take care of her.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is an example of a situation where deferential vulnerability might be a factor?
    12·1 answer
  • True or false, prejudice is often expressed by nonverbal behaviors
    7·1 answer
  • __________ refers to the allocation of responses to choices available on concurrent schedules of reinforcement. Rates of respond
    14·1 answer
  • John Jay served the United States in all of the following ways EXCEPT
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true of pluralists?
    8·1 answer
  • Select the correct locations on the image<br>I NEED HELP FAST
    7·1 answer
  • How did Muslim scholars build upon Greco-Roman culture?
    13·1 answer
  • Explain how family and peer-group socialization differ.
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is more likely to be written in a vernacular?
    14·2 answers
  • Do yall belive in jesus
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!