Answer:
Agree about the issue or be against it and discuss.
Explanation:
When writing down an argumentative writing, you may write down as many current issues that you can think of, even if you have not yet formed strong opinions about them. Just make sure that they are issues--matters open to discussion and debate. Arguments are not one-sided, as much as we might sometimes wish they were. If they were only made up of one side, it would be so much easier to win. But such is life, and facing different perspectives from your own is a part of an argument; even if you feel other perspectives are harmful and perpetuate hateful ideals that you cannot even try to understand on a personal level.
You can hope that everyone will come to see things the way you do, but until then, give them a hard time by proving that yo have got the knowledge to back yourself up and rid them of any leverage they might have been prepared to place on your assumed ignorance.
"When the verb is passive the subject undergoes the action rather than doing it"<span>
So it would be option two because Taro (the subject) is being appointed, opposed to cooking, studying and trying .</span>
This question is about Ronald Reagan's speech, entitled "A Time for Choosing".
Answer:
As you did not provide the lines to which this question refers, my answer may be a little inaccurate, because the numbering of lines I have from this course may be different from the numbering of lines to which your question refers.
However, the premise in the paragraph that begins on line 39 according to my text is that the loss of freedom is not beneficial to anyone and that it causes pain and suffering to anyone.
Explanation:
On line 39 Reagan talks about the experience that a friend of his, a Cuban refugee, had to face because of the country's lack of freedom. he had to flee from Cuba, even though he was a successful businessman. Some people reported that he was lucky to be able to leave the country and he even agrees, because he had this option, although many of his fellow citizens do not.
Reagan uses this story to show how the lack of freedom is harmful to anyone, regardless of their social position or their ability to escape. The lack of freedom is harmful for that reason, it cannot be allowed in America.
What’s sentence you need to know the answer?
Answer:
I would say 1.
Explanation:
Very sorry if it's wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)