Answer:
B). Comparative negligence.
Explanation:
'Comparative Negligence' is demonstrated as the legal doctrine in which an individual's compensation for an accident or injury is commensurable or proportionate to his/her percentage or degree of responsibility/liability.
in the given example, Susan would most probably employ 'comparative intelligence' to defend herself as damage caused by the dog to shoes and other valuable items was not only due to owner's negligence(but the neighbors/plaintiff too). <u>Thus, this would help Susan to proportionately reduce the amount of the recovery received by the plaintiffs as they too were contributory to the negligence that resulted in damage. </u>Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
This sentence contains a dangling modifier.
Answer:
it's correct
Explanation:
please mark brainiest hope it works out for you
Answer:
I have two opinions on this, I would choose Stephen Hawking, BUT he is dead so I would choose Bill Gates. These men are some of the more brilliant minds we have had in a while.
Explanation:
