Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Answer: i dont know the amswer
Explanation:
....ultimately limited by the states. States reserve the right to set the wage limit. That said, it likely won't stop the Federal government from trying.
Answer – The therapeutic alliance
Researchers have found out that the therapeutic alliance (which
is also known as therapeutic
relationship<span>,
therapeutic alliance, the helping alliance, or the working alliance)</span> is greatly facilitated by matching
Asian-American clients with counselors who share their cultural values.
