Answer:
true
Explanation:
They did all this and more. They also killed them and gave them new diseases they couldn't fight off.
Brooker T. Washington is very clear about how silly the segregation laws are.
He specifies that the fact that segregation coming from black people would be treated as a stigma, as a bad thing and as a crime, therefore it can't be legal.
In addition, he can't really see the point of making laws that forbid interracial relationships for the sake of not mixing races. Even if they really wanted to prevent the races to be mixed, he pointed out to the fact that the races didn't share the same social spaces. Many times, not even physical spaces.
He also mentions that there's no such a thing as white people suffering because of a black neighborhood nearby. He says that he can use the white people from the South as an example of how silly that sort of comment is.
In the end, he condemned the fact that the laws exist not because he believes that many blacks want to be mixed socially with whites, but mostly because a law that promotes segregation is something that just should not exist.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The isolation period in Japan, known in Japanese as Sakoku, meaning "closed country", started in 1639 by Tokugawa lemitsu, the third Shōgun (military dictator) of the Tokugawa Shogunate.
The period of Sakoku lasted until 1853, when American Navy Official Mathew Perry use military force to compel Japan to open its ports to trade.
During this period, the only contact that Japan had with the world was through with China through the port of Nagasaki, and with the Dutch, who had a small factory in the town of Dejima.
Answer: Profit-maximizing output is the point at which marginal revenue and marginal cost are equal.
Explanation: In other words, profit-maximizing output is when <em>MR = MC.</em>
Answer:
The major change in the U.S immigration policy that was reflected in the United States Immigration Act of 1965 was the abolition of the quota system of immigration based on national origin which was what was invoke prior to the enactment of the 1965 Immigration Act.
Explanation:
The United States Immigration Act of 1965 brought with it innovation in the U.S immigration policy. Prior to the enactment of the Act, immigration into the U.S was based on a quota system which was bench-marked on national origin. The quota system was viewed as discriminatory, thus some civil rights movements clamored against it and called for a reform of the United States Immigration policy. This led to a heated debate in the United States congress, and consequently, the enactment of the 1965 Immigration Act which abolished the quota system and enthroned a more liberal immigration policy which was more accommodating of immigrants. The 1965 Immigration Act focused more on absorbing immigrants with skilled labor and refugees from war torn countries into the United States as well as reuniting immigrant families.
