1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Jlenok [28]
3 years ago
12

What might happen if our country returned to a system of bartering

History
1 answer:
yan [13]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Hope this helps :)

Explanation:

Human partnerships will be strengthened: Since bartering does not necessarily result in a flawless trade, people must trust one another to keep their word as conditions change. Since goods are not as easily divisible as property, you will have to take part of your payment now and part later. Bartering would also make more of our company public so we'd have to share both our needs and our abilities, allowing our bartering group to get to know us better.

You might be interested in
How did the native americans feels when they first saw the pilgrems
alexandr402 [8]

this is how they felt.

When the Mayflower came, first to the outer arm of the Cape and then into Plimoth, we looked on them with apprehension and great curiosity. It was much larger than our biggest canoe. As they landed, they brought a lot of baggage with them and seemed like they were here to stay. We knew that there would be great changes in the way we would live.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was Columbus really a conqueror? was he the bad guy? explain your reasoning 5 sentences​
Degger [83]

Answer:

1.Christopher Columbus was a fraud.2. He was indeed a brave and prolific explorer.  3.but he also was a brutal evil man who never even made it to the place that is now the United States.4. We all believe that Columbus is a villain than a hero.

5.First of all, according to Wikipedia, A hero (masculine) or heroine (feminine) is a person or main character of a literary work who, in the face of danger, combats adversity through feats of ingenuity, bravery or strength, often sacrificing their own personal concerns for a greater good. However, based on what we have learned about Christopher Columbus, what he did has nothing to do with the definition of hero. His motivation to take the travel was to arrive in India, a country in east Asia, to obtain gold. From this perspective, his motivation was not noble. In addition, he did not arrive in India.

Secondly, he set a bad example to colonists came later. According to the article “Christopher Columbus: Hero or Murderer?” by Whitney DeWitt, it is said that “Columbus’s arrogance and exploitation regarding slavery began on his second voyage. Ferdinand and Isabella had ordered that the natives be treated kindly. In opposition to this order, Columbus began exporting slaves in great numbers in 1494.” His way to treat the native residents was improper and rude, which is bad model to colonists who came later. A hero is supposed to be a decent man who get rid of bad reputation. Columbus’ behavior did not conform to the standard.

Because of the reasons given above, it will be hard to classify Christopher Columbus as a hero. His motivation to come to American continent was not noble. He set a bad example to colonists who came later. In addition, his arrival caused a catastrophe to local residents. Therefore, he is more like a villain than a hero.

brainliest plz

8 0
2 years ago
Which one is the CORRECT answer??
cupoosta [38]

Answer:

below

Explanation:

Allah's messenger

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were Japan's actions before and during World War II similar to
fredd [130]

Answer:

Both countries engaged in the mass killing of innocent people in

conquered territories

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the connection among sectionalism, slavery, and states’ rights as causes of the Civil War? How did the Southern response
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer:

Sectionalism divided the country between North and South.

One of the main causes of this dissension was the existence of slavery.

The Southern states claimed they had the right to demand that their states' rights superseded national concerns.

Explanation:

Looked it up on google I hope this helps

Mark Brainliest if correct please :)

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • It is thought that the Hittites began by:
    13·2 answers
  • Thomas Edison invented the
    10·2 answers
  • What was one problem prior to World War I?
    8·2 answers
  • What was the London company
    5·1 answer
  • How do you mark brainliest
    7·2 answers
  • How did the attack of Pearl Harbor change the course of World War Two
    8·1 answer
  • Which space exploration vehicle has no crew and is used to collect data?
    11·1 answer
  • If the relationship is proportional, what is the missing value from the table? x y 8 6 16 ? 24 18 8 9 12 14
    15·2 answers
  • How did the Aztec Civilization in the Americas develop ? *
    7·2 answers
  • 1. Define the Enlightenment. Who were the main philosophers and what were their beliefs? How did they influence the Declaration
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!