The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
Answer:
<em>D </em><em>is </em><em>the</em><em> best</em><em> answer</em><em> </em><em>I </em><em>think</em>
Answer:
Spain saw Britain as a rival and wanted to expand its own territory in North America.
Explanation:
The helped counter balance Britain's naval power. The Continental Navy had roughly 20 ships and Britain's Navy had roughly 500. The Spanish ships helped make it hard for the British Navy to blockade the American coast. They also send advisers to the colonists to help train them and help them improve.
Answer:
it says on a website "he denounced the attack and asked congress for a declaration of war on Japan"
