1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
azamat
3 years ago
15

Name 2 famous Native American chiefs

History
2 answers:
lilavasa [31]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Geronimo

Chief Joseph

Explanation:

Im not 100% sure this is correct

kotykmax [81]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Chief Joseph

King Philip

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which robber baron was best known for his involvement in railroads?
joja [24]

Answer: I believe it's D.

Explanation:

J.P. Morgan

8 0
2 years ago
How did the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists feel about the Constitution? Use the information from the reading and class tod
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not. One of the major issues these two parties debated concerned the inclusion of the Bill of Rights. The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they ... they eventually made the concession and announced a willingness to take up

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Is it hard hard hard hard. Hard hard
laiz [17]

Answer:

what is?

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following examples shows the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic?
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

All of the choices are correct. The fact that Censors appointed, and could remove, senators;  Tribunes could veto laws; and Consuls were elected for one-year terms are examples of the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic.

Explanation:

The Roman Republic was a political regime with a highly original approach. A regime that, despite all its political intrigues, reached almost 500 years. Probably, one of the reasons why it lasted so long is because it was a carefully balanced system. In this regard, the Greek historian Polybius said that Rome had a mixed government, fruit of a process that he called anacyclosis. It is known as such, to the succession of a series of political systems due to its irremediable tendency towards degeneration. Consequently, Rome knew a monarchy that degenerated into tyranny, also an aristocracy that ended up being oligarchic, until finally it reached a system closer to democracy.

In this way, the Roman Republic could contain features of these three political systems, thus giving it, according to Polybius, a certain superiority. Why? Because the main elements of the republic, which embody each of the three systems, must cooperate so that it works. For example, for a war, the consul - monarchy - will need, both a resolution of the senate -aristocracy- for the sending of legions, and the approval of the people (in elections) -democracy-, since it is whoever annuls or ratifies the armistices and treaties. In addition, the Senate will also depend on the people, because it is the people who, after the deliberation of the Senate, must approve those procedures in which there are crimes against the State that are punished with the death penalty. Likewise, the people will need the Senate insofar as this chamber is fundamental to carry out the public works that are first executed through the management of the town.  

What does the description described so far mean? Simply, that we are before a forerunner of the system of checks and balances. The current one, coming from Locke and Montesquieu, proposes a division between executive, legislative and judicial. But its old equivalent did not distinguish between powers, but forced an interorganic cooperation. In this way, in order to carry out certain competences, it might be necessary for two or more bodies to collaborate, thus preventing any of them from acting in a despotic manner. Meanwhile, there is currently a division of competence according to which each body has established guidelines, and the key to avoid despotism is precisely the opposite: that none of them interfere in the competencies of others.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following powers does the president have as commander in<br> chief?
sasho [114]

Answer: Be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.

The President may “require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices.”

The President may veto or approve laws passed by the House and Senate. The President must veto the entire measure or pass it.

The President is authorized to grant pardons and reprieves (except in cases of impeachment).

The President has the power to make treaties, as long as a two-thirds majority “of the Senators present” agree.  

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • All of the following were part of the Populist Party's program except A. a flat income tax—everyone pays the same rate or percen
    9·2 answers
  • What is the major reason for animosity toward chinese immigrants in the countries of southeast asia?
    5·1 answer
  • If there were no system of checks and balances, the process of government would eventually fall apart. Do you agree with this op
    10·2 answers
  • Whích three of the following represented the Ku Klux Klan?
    13·2 answers
  • Approximately how many soldiers were killed during the great war ​
    15·2 answers
  • Where did the woman suffrage movement begin
    15·1 answer
  • What was the main goal of the Works Progress Administration (WPA)?
    11·2 answers
  • 1. Immigrants from northern Europe *
    13·1 answer
  • In inca What modern countries do the road systems run through?
    12·2 answers
  • The original design of Auschwitz-Birkenau included four large extermination chambers.
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!