Answer:
Why shouldn't we judge historical figures by the standards of our time?
Many of the vices we might rightfully judge a historical society or individual for are largely universal across culture and society.
We should judge them accordingly and learn from their mistakes, but we should also judge them by the degree to which that person or culture rejected those common vices and built something better. This is something quite rare and it’s far more useful as a learning tool for us to focus on this.
For example, the Greeks and Romans practiced slaveryBut so did every other ancient society. What is unique and admirable about the Greeks and Romans is the degree to which they did respect indvidual rights, seriously questioned slavery as an institution, and developed a secular, pro reason culture
if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest
Answer:
The southern part of Chile
Not many could get into the place, so no one could come spread other religions. They stuck to their own religion, islam.
I believe the correct answers are A, C, and D.
A because the revolution involved Protestants overthrowing James II for being "too Catholic", C because the Glorious Revolution did not involve fighting, and D because it is true that William and Mary were asked to take control.
B is incorrect because part of the problem in England was that James did not consult Parliament enough.
